BlackLeafwatch the watchmen
AmeriCorps grant oversight of YouthBuild USA

YouthBuild's Broken Timekeeping Puts $12.65M at Risk

Summary

An AmeriCorps Office of Inspector General audit tested 5 of YouthBuild USA's 82 subgrantees and found $6.69 million in questioned costs and funds put to better use -- most of it tracing to a timekeeping system YouthBuild never required anyone to independently check, and to one subgrantee, San Jose Conservation Corps, that recruited its own employees as AmeriCorps members and let them earn education awards for hours worked on the job they already had. Because every subgrantee ran on the same non-compliant policy, OIG classified $12.65 million in education awards across all 82 subgrantees of YouthBuild's two audited grants -- about 23% of the $55.28 million AmeriCorps awarded YouthBuild since 2018 -- as resting on hours nobody can verify were actually served. AmeriCorps has formally refused to recover any of it.

By Marcus Aurelius · July 22, 2026

AmeriCorps members earn a living allowance and, after completing their term, an education award -- both funded with federal money and both premised on one fact that has to actually be true: that the member served the hours claimed. A performance audit by AmeriCorps' Office of Inspector General tested just 5 of YouthBuild USA's 82 subgrantees and found $6,692,146 in questioned costs and misclassified funds -- and concluded that the same broken timekeeping system touches $12,651,304 in education awards across all 82 subgrantees of the two grants it reviewed.

A regulatory gap AmeriCorps knew about for 15 years

In 2009, the Serve America Act eliminated an 85% cap on the federal share of AmeriCorps members' living allowances and support costs. AmeriCorps never updated the Federal Regulations that still state the old 85% limit -- and internal correspondence from 2019 shows its own Associate General Counsel acknowledging the regulations were outdated and telling staff to just point grantees to the statute instead. 's own analysis of grant data found only 64% of AmeriCorps State and National grants from 2019 through 2023 were administered consistent with the outdated regulation -- meaning a third of grantees, YouthBuild's national-direct awards among them, effectively got a better deal than others simply by not knowing, or not following, rules AmeriCorps itself had stopped enforcing 15 years earlier.

Education awards at risk
$12.65M
System-wide across 82 subgrantees of 2 AmeriCorps grants; $10.78M of it still outstanding as of Oct. 31, 2023
Monetary impact, 5 subgrantees tested
$6.69M
Questioned Federal and match costs plus funds put to better use; a further $1.04M in non-compliant match was COVID-waived from questioning
Share of YouthBuild's award at risk
22.9%
$12.65M of the $55.28M AmeriCorps awarded YouthBuild, Sept. 2018-Dec. 2022, sits behind unverified timekeeping
Where the $6.69M in questioned costs and funds put to better use comes from
Monetary impact by audit finding, 5 tested subgrantees, FY2018-FY2022 grant activity
Timekeeping practices non-compliant
3,608,618
SJCC employees served as members
3,025,779
Inadequate subgrantee monitoring
57,749
Source: AmeriCorps OIG, Report OIG-AR-24-05, Table 1
View data as table
OIG's $6,692,146 total monetary-impact figure (questioned Federal costs plus questioned match costs plus funds put to better use, excluding a separate $1,042,851 in non-compliant match AmeriCorps waived for COVID-19 years) breaks into three findings: $3.61 million tied to YouthBuild's own non-compliant member timekeeping practices, $3.03 million tied to one subgrantee, San Jose Conservation Corps, recruiting its own employees as AmeriCorps members, and $57,749 tied to inadequate subgrantee monitoring generally.
Timekeeping practices non-compliant3,608,618$520,827 in education awards already paid plus $3,087,791 classified as funds put to better use
SJCC employees served as members3,025,779Federal and match costs questioned after a subgrantee recruited its own employees as AmeriCorps members
Inadequate subgrantee monitoring57,749Federal and match costs questioned for compliance gaps YouthBuild's own monitoring did not catch

A timekeeping template nobody double-checked

YouthBuild's subgrantees tracked AmeriCorps member hours on a monthly template, hand-copied from daily service logs and school attendance sheets. found that transfer step was never reviewed by a second staff member, and the template's totals were never checked against members' exit evaluations or the hours logged in AmeriCorps' own eGrants system. YouthBuild's policy also never required subgrantees to record time members spent on other funded work -- only their AmeriCorps hours -- leaving no way to verify a member's claimed service time wasn't also being billed to a different federal, state, or private grant.

Employees who were also "members"

The costliest single finding involved San Jose Conservation Corps (SJCC), a YouthBuild subgrantee that recruited its own prospective and existing employees to serve as AmeriCorps members -- letting them earn education awards for hours they were already being paid to work in their normal jobs. questioned $2,125,096 in federal costs and $900,683 in match costs tied to that practice alone, more than the amount tied to YouthBuild's own timekeeping failures. YouthBuild's inadequate monitoring of its subgrantees -- the mechanism that should have caught this -- added a further $57,749 in questioned costs.

$12.65 million in education awards rest on the same broken timekeeping
Education awards earned under YouthBuild's non-compliant timekeeping policy, by whether the subgrantee was actually audited
5 tested subgrantees
3,608,618
77 untested subgrantees
9,042,686
Source: AmeriCorps OIG, Report OIG-AR-24-05, Table 2
View data as table
The OIG tested 5 of YouthBuild's 82 subgrantees and found their members' education awards -- $3.61 million worth, most of it already paid -- rested on hours nobody independently verified. Because every subgrantee used the same non-compliant timekeeping policy, OIG classified the remaining $9.04 million paid or owed to the other subgrantees' members, across the same two grants, as equally at risk -- $10.78 million of the combined $12.65 million had not yet been disbursed as of October 31, 2023.
5 tested subgrantees3,608,618$520,827 already paid, $3,087,791 still outstanding -- the OIG's audited sample
77 untested subgrantees9,042,686$1,349,717 already paid, $7,692,969 still outstanding -- same timekeeping policy, never independently checked

AmeriCorps says the policy was fine. Its own regulations disagree.

recommended AmeriCorps recover $520,827 in education awards already paid under the non-compliant timekeeping, require YouthBuild to pay the $3,087,791 still outstanding, and assess whether the remaining $9,042,686 at risk across YouthBuild's other 77 subgrantees has adequate documentation. AmeriCorps refused all three recommendations, arguing YouthBuild's timekeeping was consistent with what the agency "intended" its own Terms and Conditions to mean, even though those Terms and Conditions cite the federal documentation standard verbatim. 's rebuttal: "Federal grants... are not governed by intentions, but rather by Federal Statutes, Regulations, and AmeriCorps' general and specific Terms and Conditions." The stakes reach beyond one grantee -- notes that 30% of all its investigations opened since 2019 involve allegations of false or problematic timekeeping, enough that the office has named it a Top Management Challenge for the agency.

  • A five-subgrantee sample found $6.69 million in problems -- and extrapolated the risk to all 82. Because every YouthBuild subgrantee ran on the same non-compliant timekeeping policy, the education awards behind that policy -- $12.65 million system-wide, $10.78 million of it still unpaid as of October 2023 -- carry the same unverified status, whether or not actually tested them.
  • AmeriCorps knew its own regulations were outdated for 15 years and didn't fix them. Internal correspondence from 2019 shows the agency's own Associate General Counsel aware the Federal Regulations hadn't caught up to a 2009 statutory change -- and only about 64% of AmeriCorps grants nationwide were administered under the version actually in force.
  • One subgrantee recruited its own employees as AmeriCorps members. San Jose Conservation Corps let existing staff earn education awards for hours already covered by their paychecks -- the single largest dollar finding in the audit, at just over $3.9 million across questioned Federal, match, and non-compliant match costs.
  • AmeriCorps refused to recover any of the disputed money. The agency rejected 's recommendations to recover paid awards, require repayment of outstanding ones, or even assess whether the remaining $9 million-plus has adequate documentation -- calling YouthBuild's practice consistent with regulatory "intent," a standard says federal grants are not governed by.

Report -AR-24-05 was issued March 29, 2024; this piece reflects the audit's findings and both parties' formal responses as recorded in that report, not any subsequent recovery action. 's testing covered 5 of YouthBuild's 82 subgrantees and two of its AmeriCorps State and National grants (16NDHMA001 and 19NDHMA003); the $12.65 million at-risk figure is 's own extrapolation of the tested findings' underlying cause -- non-compliant timekeeping -- to the full population of subgrantees under those two grants, not a finding that misconduct occurred at all 82. The $1,042,851 in non-compliant match costs tied to COVID-19-era match waivers is excluded from the $6.69 million monetary-impact total by the report's own accounting.

Sources(2) ▾
  • AmeriCorps Office of Inspector General, Performance Audit of AmeriCorps Grants Awarded to YouthBuild USA (OIG Report No. AR-24-05) (2024-03-29)Final performance audit report, 20+ pages including appendices, conducted for AmeriCorps by the independent CPA firm Saggar and Rosenberg, P.C. under Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards. Fetched directly and read in full (transmittal memorandum, Executive Summary, both narrative findings sections, Table 1 and Table 2 monetary-impact tables, and AmeriCorps' and YouthBuild's written management responses with the 's evaluation of each). The PDF is hosted at oversight.gov, the federal government's cross-agency Inspector General portal -- and is the exact file AmeriCorps 's own report landing page links to as its primary document. oversight.gov · original document
  • AmeriCorps Office of Inspector General, Performance Audit of AmeriCorps Grants Awarded to YouthBuild USA -- report landing page (2024-03-29)AmeriCorps 's own website listing for this audit; its download link points directly at the oversight.gov-hosted PDF used as doc-oig-ar-24-05, confirming the report is the office's own official release and not a third-party mirror. americorpsoig.gov · original document
Weekly digest: the most-read systems, in brief. Mondays.

Comments

Always open. Logged-in readers can annotate paragraphs in place.

Loading comments…
or log in to comment under your account