The Police Budget Line Nobody Voted For
Summary
In FY2025, the Justice Department's forfeiture fund paid $453.8 million straight to 2,687 state, local and tribal police agencies — no legislature, no appropriation. Now DOJ wants to double its own cut.
Where the fund's money goes
The AFF is a revolving account, not an appropriation: it fills up with cash, property, and sale proceeds forfeited in federal cases — $2,313,596,956 deposited in FY2025 alone, according to 's own state-by-state deposit report — and drains back out to cover victim compensation, program operations, and payments to the agencies that helped make the case. 's Asset Forfeiture Program trend data puts total FY2025 fund expenses at $1.991 billion. Of that, $453.8 million (23%) went to domestic state, local, and tribal law enforcement, and another $103.0 million went to foreign governments that cooperated on cases — together almost a third of everything the fund spent that year.
View data as table
| AFF total expenses, FY2025 | $1,991M | DOJ AFP trend table |
|---|---|---|
| Equitable sharing — state/local/tribal police | $453.8M | to 2,687 agencies |
| Foreign sharing | $103.0M | payments to foreign governments |
| Other Fund expenses | $1,434.3M | remainder — victim comp., operations, transfers |
That $453.8 million did not go through a single legislature. It moved agency-to-agency, case by case, under 's Guide to Equitable Sharing for State, Local, and Tribal Law Enforcement Agencies, which lets a department that helps a federal investigation keep up to 80% of what gets forfeited. It is real operating money for the recipients — patrol cars, overtime, equipment — sitting entirely outside the ordinary budget cycle voters see.
The money is not evenly spread
Equitable sharing rewards volume and case size, not population or crime rate, so the payouts cluster. DOJ's agency-level FY2025 report shows New Jersey — driven by a small number of large financial-crime cases running through its federal district — topped every state at $58.4 million, ahead of California, Texas, Florida, and New York. Ten states took in nearly half of the entire $453.8 million national total.
View data as table
| New Jersey | $58.4M |
|---|---|
| California | $42.6M |
| Texas | $33.2M |
| Florida | $30.7M |
| New York | $28.9M |
| Illinois | $25.7M |
| Virginia | $19.2M |
| Ohio | $18.2M |
| Pennsylvania | $15.4M |
| Maryland | $13.6M |
A single case can decide a state's ranking for the year. That volatility is the whole design: unlike a tax levy or a state aid formula, equitable sharing has no floor, no cap, and no guarantee it repeats next year — which is exactly what makes departments that rely on it structurally exposed.
Meanwhile, the backlog keeps growing
Behind the annual payout sits a much bigger, mostly unpublicized pile. At the close of fiscal year 2025, was still holding 78,762 seized assets worth $7.35 billion gross — cash, digital assets, vehicles, real estate — net of liens and competing claims down to $3.22 billion, according to the department's own Summary of Property Under Seizure with Lien Values. None of that has been forfeited yet; it is property the government is holding while cases work through the system, a pipeline several times larger than what moves through equitable sharing in any single year. And since 2023, per 's own Asset Forfeiture Policy Manual, the department no longer transfers seized property itself to state and local agencies through equitable sharing — only cash and sale proceeds. The boats and trucks stopped moving; the money didn't.
wants a bigger cut
On June 23, 2026, told law enforcement groups it is considering raising its own share of every forfeiture from 20% to 40% — halving what participating state and local agencies keep, according to the National Association of Police Organizations' account of the announcement. NAPO raised the proposal directly with Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche at a June 29 White House law enforcement roundtable; has not yet announced a final decision. Applied to FY2025's actual $453.8 million in domestic equitable-sharing payments, a move from an 80/20 to a 60/40 split would mean roughly $113 million less reaching local police departments a year, at last year's forfeiture volume — money departments across 2,687 agencies had built into planning for cars, overtime, and equipment they do not budget for through any other channel.
The takeaway
- $453.8 million moved to police agencies in FY2025 with no legislature involved — equitable sharing runs entirely outside the normal municipal and state budget process.
- The money is lumpy and concentrated. Ten states took in nearly half the national total in FY2025, and a single large case can swing a state's ranking year to year — the opposite of a stable funding stream.
- A far bigger pile sits unresolved. $7.35 billion in seized assets hadn't been forfeited at all as of the FY2025 count — several years' worth of equitable-sharing payments, held in limbo.
- is now proposing to keep more of it. A shift from an 80/20 to a 60/40 split, if adopted, would cut the flow to local police by roughly a quarter at last year's volumes — a decision made inside the department, not by the departments that depend on the money.
Dollar and count figures cover U.S. Department of Justice fiscal year 2025 (Oct. 1, 2024 – Sept. 30, 2025) unless otherwise noted; the agency count is BlackLeaf's tally of unique recipient agencies listed in 's own FY2025 payment report. The proposed 20%-to-40% federal-share change was described by to law enforcement groups as under consideration, not yet final, as of this writing.
Sources
- Asset Forfeiture Program — "Total Net Deposits to the Fund by State of Deposit, Fiscal Year 2025," the source for total AFF deposits ($2.31 billion). justice.gov
- Asset Forfeiture Program — "Total Receipts and Expenses" trend table, the source for FY2025 total fund expenses ($1.991 billion). justice.gov/afp
- Asset Forfeiture Program — "Equitable Sharing Payments Grand Total of Cash and Sale Proceeds, Fiscal Year 2025," the source for the $453.8 million paid to state/local/tribal agencies and the $103.0 million in foreign sharing. justice.gov
- Asset Forfeiture Program — "Equitable Sharing Payments of Cash and Sale Proceeds by Recipient Agency, Fiscal Year 2025," the agency-by-agency, state-by-state detail behind the state chart and the 2,687-agency count. justice.gov
- Asset Forfeiture Program — "Summary of Property Under Seizure with Lien Values by Type of Property, Fiscal Year 2025," the source for the 78,762-item, $7.35 billion (gross) seizure backlog. justice.gov
- Asset Forfeiture Program — "Justice Property Transferred to Non-Federal Agencies by Type, Fiscal Year 2025," documenting the 2023 policy change ending physical-property transfers under equitable sharing. justice.gov
- U.S. Department of Justice & Department of the Treasury — "Guide to Equitable Sharing for State, Local, and Tribal Law Enforcement Agencies" (2024), governing rules for the sharing program, including the up-to-80% local share. home.treasury.gov
- National Association of Police Organizations — account of 's June 23, 2026 communication proposing to raise the federal equitable-sharing share from 20% to 40%, and the June 29 White House law enforcement roundtable where it was raised with Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche. napo.org
Comments
Always open. Logged-in readers can annotate paragraphs in place.
Every municipal police budget goes through the same ritual: a chief proposes, a council argues, a public hearing gets held, a line item gets cut or funded. None of that applies to the money in this story. When a federal case ends in forfeiture, the U.S. Department of Justice can voluntarily cut participating state, local, and tribal agencies back in — a program called equitable sharing — and the check shows up with no budget vote attached, because it was never taxpayer money that a legislature appropriated in the first place. In fiscal year 2025, 's Assets Forfeiture Fund (AFF) equitable-sharing report put $453.8 million of exactly that kind of money into 2,687 police, sheriff, and tribal agencies. Now the department is telling those same agencies it wants a bigger cut for itself.