BlackLeafwatch the watchmen
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

The CFPB Asked the Fed for Zero Dollars, Three Quarters Running

Summary

Acting Director Russell Vought called the Bureau's $711.6 million reserve "excessive" and stopped drawing money from the Federal Reserve. A court order forced him to ask again — but his March request, $75.8 million, is a figure his own letter says isn't what the law requires. The same court filing asks to cut the 1,174-person staff that enforces consumer-protection law down to 556.

By Locusta · July 9, 2026

The Consumer Financial Protection Act requires the Federal Reserve to transfer the whatever amount its director certifies is "reasonably necessary" each quarter — the Bureau isn't funded by Congress, it draws on the Fed. Every prior director used that mechanism to keep the lights on. Acting Director Russell Vought, who runs the Bureau while also serving as White House budget director, used it to turn the lights off: on February 8, 2025, he told Fed Chair Jerome Powell that the 's $711.6 million balance was "in fact excessive in the current fiscal environment" and that "no additional funds are necessary" for the rest of that fiscal year, per reporting on his letter. He kept that posture for three straight quarters — until a judge ordered him to start asking again.

FY2026 funding cap
$466.8M
6.5% of the Fed's 2009 operating expenses
Requested, FY25 Q3 – FY26 Q1
$0
three quarters, one memo
Staff: onboard → proposed
1,174 → 556
−53%, per the Bureau's own plan

Three quarters of nothing

Directors Rohit Chopra and, before him, every head since 2011 filed a funds-transfer request every quarter, without exception, as the Bureau's own transfer-request archive shows going back to 2011. Chopra requested $248.9 million for the first quarter of FY2025 and $245.1 million for the second. Then Vought took over in February 2025, zeroed out the remaining two quarters of FY2025 in a single letter, and kept requesting nothing through the first quarter of FY2026 — spending down the existing balance instead. A December 30, 2025 opinion from Judge Amy Berman Jackson in NTEU v. Vought forced the issue, ruling that the statute's "combined earnings" language means the Fed's revenues, not its profits, so the funding mechanism was lawful regardless of the Fed's own balance sheet. Bound by that order, Vought requested $145 million on January 9, 2026 — while writing to Powell that he still "disagree[d] with the opinion and order" — and $75.8 million on March 30, 2026, for the third quarter of FY2026.

CFPB funds-transfer requests to the Federal Reserve
Dollar amount requested per quarter, FY2025 Q1 – FY2026 Q3
FY25 Q1 (Oct '24)
$248.9M
FY25 Q2 (Jan '25)
$245.1M
FY25 Q3 (Apr '25)
$0
FY25 Q4 (Jul '25)
$0
FY26 Q1 (Oct '25)
$0
FY26 Q2 (Jan '26)
$145M
FY26 Q3 (Apr '26)
$75.8M
Source: CFPB funds-transfer request and Federal Reserve acknowledgment letters; Consumer Finance Monitor, Banking Dive
View data as table
Quarterly funds-transfer requests
FY25 Q1$248.9MChopra request, Oct. 8, 2024
FY25 Q2$245.1MChopra request, Dec. 19, 2024
FY25 Q3$0Vought — reserve called "excessive"
FY25 Q4$0no request filed
FY26 Q1$0no request filed
FY26 Q2$145.0Mcourt-ordered request, Jan. 9, 2026
FY26 Q3$75.8MVought's own floor, not his stated need

The March letter is the sharpest document in the file. Vought writes, verbatim, that the $75.8 million figure "does not reflect the amount that I believe to be reasonably necessary for the Bureau to perform its statutory functions. I believe that the Bureau can perform its statutory duties with a significantly smaller budget and provide the number above to comply with the referenced court order." In other words: the director is on record saying the number in his own funding request is not the number the law asked him to certify — he's requesting the least he can get away with, not what he was ordered to determine.

The math the memo admits

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (P.L. 119-21), signed July 4, 2025, cut the 's statutory funding cap — Section 30001 amends 12 U.S.C. §5497(a)(2)(A)(iii) by striking "12" and inserting "6.5" — from 12% to 6.5% of the Federal Reserve System's 2009 operating expenses, indexed for inflation. That caps FY2026 transfers at $466.8 million. The Bureau's own workforce restructuring plan, a memo Deputy Director Geoffrey Gradler wrote and Vought approved, does the arithmetic against that cap: in the FY2025 budget approved under the prior administration, payroll alone ran $526.4 million — 65.27% of an $806.4 million total budget. Both numbers already exceed the new cap on their own. The memo's own words: "It would be mathematically impossible to comply with the law without a workforce restructuring and reduction."

That memo, filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on March 31, 2026 as part of the same NTEU v. Vought litigation, is where the staffing plan lives. It asks the court to lift the injunction that has frozen a reduction in force since 2025, so the Bureau can cut its onboard headcount of 1,174 down to 556 — a number down from 1,723 authorized positions at the start of the administration.

Who absorbs the cut
Current onboard staff by division, FY2026; proposed post-restructuring headcount in the note
Supervision
350
Operations
255
Research, Monitoring & Regulations
142
Enforcement
137
Consumer Response & Education
127
Director's office
62
Legal
60
External Affairs
30
Other programs
11
Source: CFPB Workforce Restructuring Plan, filed with the D.C. Circuit, March 31, 2026 (USCA Case #25-5091)
View data as table
Division headcount: current vs. proposed
Supervision350 → 77−78%
Operations255 → 133−48%
Research, Monitoring & Regulations142 → 125−12%
Enforcement137 → 50−64%
Consumer Response & Education127 → 90−29%
Director's office62 → 15−76%
Legal60 → 60no cut
External Affairs30 → 5−83%
Other programs11 → 1−91%
Grand total1,174 → 556−53%

The cuts aren't spread evenly. Supervision — the division that examines banks and lenders for compliance — loses 78% of its staff, from 350 to 77; the plan itself notes the annual exam count is already down from 107 in 2024 to a planned 64 in 2026. Enforcement, which investigates and sues companies that break consumer-finance law, loses 64%, from 137 to 50. The one division untouched is Legal, held flat at 60 — the lawyers who defend the Bureau in court, including in the very case that produced this memo, are the one group Vought's plan doesn't shrink.

The takeaway

  • The Bureau chose zero, then was ordered to choose something. Vought's February 2025 letter zeroed out three quarters on his own judgment, not because the money wasn't there — the balance he called "excessive" was $711.6 million. A federal judge, not a budget shortfall, is why the requests resumed.
  • The director's own filings say the current number is a floor, not a need. $75.8 million is what the March letter calls the amount necessary "to comply with the referenced court order" — the same letter says the real number should be lower still.
  • The staffing cut and the funding cap are the same story told twice. Congress capped FY2026 transfers at $466.8 million, below what the Bureau spent on payroll alone in FY2025; the restructuring plan is the Bureau's own arithmetic for closing that gap, mostly by cutting the examiners and investigators who supervise and sue lenders.

Dollar figures for FY2025 Q1–Q2 and FY2026 Q2–Q3 are read from signed funds-transfer letters; FY2025 Q3–Q4 and FY2026 Q1 reflect the Bureau's public zero-request posture as reported contemporaneously, since no transfer letters were filed for those quarters. Staffing figures are the Bureau's own restructuring-plan table, current as of the March 31, 2026 filing; the underlying litigation was ongoing and the plan not yet in effect as of publication.

Sources

  • , Funds Transfer Requests — the Bureau's public archive of every quarterly funding letter to and from the Federal Reserve since 2011, including the primary letters cited here (Oct. 8, 2024; Dec. 19, 2024; Jan. 9, 2026; March 30, 2026 requests, and the Fed's March 5, 2025 and April 2, 2026 acknowledgments). consumerfinance.gov
  • , Workforce Restructuring Plan — the Deputy Director's recommendation memo and division-by-division staffing table, filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, March 31, 2026, in NTEU v. Vought (USCA Case #25-5091). infobytes.orrick.com
  • Public Law 119-21 (One Big Beautiful Bill Act), Title III, Sec. 30001 — the statutory text cutting the 's Federal Reserve funding cap from 12% to 6.5% of the Fed's 2009 operating expenses. govinfo.gov
  • Consumer Finance Monitor, "Vought halts most work at " (Feb. 10, 2025) — reporting on the Feb. 8, 2025 letter to Fed Chair Powell calling the Bureau's $711.6 million balance "excessive" and zeroing out further FY2025 draws. consumerfinancemonitor.com
  • Consumer Finance Monitor, " does an about-face on its funding from Fed" (Jan. 12, 2026) — on the Dec. 30, 2025 NTEU v. Vought ruling and the resulting Jan. 9, 2026 funding request. consumerfinancemonitor.com
  • Banking Dive, " must request funds from Fed, court rules" — timeline of the funding lapse and litigation, including the FY2025 Q3/Q4 and FY2026 Q1 zero-request quarters. bankingdive.com
  • Banking Dive, " floats plan to cut staff in half" — reporting on the March 2026 workforce restructuring filing and the FY2026 funding cap's relationship to FY2025 payroll costs. bankingdive.com
  • Government Executive, "Consumer watchdog agency asks court for permission to slash its workforce by two-thirds" (April 2026) — on the appellate filing and division-level staffing context. govexec.com
Weekly digest: the most-read systems, in brief. Mondays.

Comments

Always open. Logged-in readers can annotate paragraphs in place.

Loading comments…
or log in to comment under your account