BlackLeafwatch the watchmen
Construction Wage Law

The $17.8 Billion in 'Savings' Is Mostly a Pay Cut

Summary

The Davis-Bacon Act sets minimum pay for 1.2 million construction workers on $217 billion a year in federal contracts. Seven senators introduced a bill in April 2026 to repeal it, citing a CBO estimate of $17.8 billion saved over ten years — savings the CBO itself says come mostly from lower wages and benefits, not fewer contracts. The wage data behind that floor has its own record: a federal watchdog found published rates that hadn't moved in as long as 40 years, tilted so far toward union survey data that unionized contracts set 63% of published rates in a workforce that was 14% unionized.

By Locusta · July 10, 2026

Congress writes a wage floor into nearly every federal construction contract. The Davis-Bacon Act, passed in 1931 and now backed by more than 70 related statutes, sets minimum pay on an estimated $217 billion a year in federal and federally assisted construction spending, covering roughly 1.2 million U.S. construction workers, according to the Department of Labor's own 2023 rulemaking. In April 2026, seven U.S. senators introduced a bill to repeal it outright, citing a Congressional Budget Office estimate: $17.8 billion saved over ten years. CBO's own accounting of that figure says most of it isn't paperwork or fewer contracts — "the reduction in wages and benefits would account for most of the savings from repeal." The floor being repealed for savings has, for two decades, run on wage data a federal watchdog called unreliable.

Federal construction covered annually
$217B
Construction workers under its wage floor
1.2M
Projected 10-yr savings from repeal
$17.8B
mostly wage & benefit cuts, per CBO

How the floor gets set

The Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division sets Davis-Bacon's "prevailing wage" by surveying what contractors actually pay, by trade and by county, then publishing the rate paid to the majority of workers in each classification. Contractors on covered federal or federally-assisted contracts over $2,000 have to match it. The survey that produces that number has a documented skew: GAO found that of Labor's published key-classification wage rates as of November 12, 2010, 63% were "union-prevailing" — set by the rate in a collective bargaining agreement — even though only 14% of construction workers nationwide carried union representation that year, per the data cites. Labor's survey process doesn't test whether respondents represent the local workforce, and found nonunion contractors were more likely to skip the survey altogether, in part because they have a harder time compiling the paperwork.

Published wage rates vs. actual union membership
Construction workers, Nov. 2010
Published wage rates that were union-prevailing
63%
Construction workers actually unionized
14%
Source: U.S. GAO, Davis-Bacon Act: Methodological Changes Needed to Improve Wage Survey (GAO-11-152, Mar. 2011), p. 19, citing 2010 BLS data
View data as table
Union share of wage rates vs. workforce
Published wage rates that were union-prevailing63%Nov. 12, 2010
Construction workers actually unionized nationwide14%2010, BLS

A floor that moved for some, not others

Union and nonunion rates update on different clocks. Union rates shift automatically when a new collective-bargaining agreement is signed; nonunion rates only move when Labor completes a fresh area survey — a process found could take years. As of that same November 2010 snapshot, 75% of union-prevailing rates were three years old or less, versus 36% of nonunion-prevailing rates; 46% of nonunion rates were a decade or older. A 2004 Labor OIG sample, cited in the same report, had already found errors in almost 100% of the wage survey forms Labor's own analysts had reviewed and "verified."

Wage rates updated within 3 years, by type
Union-prevailing vs. nonunion-prevailing rates, Nov. 2010
Union-prevailing rates
75%
Nonunion-prevailing rates
36%
Source: U.S. GAO, Davis-Bacon Act: Methodological Changes Needed to Improve Wage Survey (GAO-11-152, Mar. 2011), p. 17
View data as table
Share of rates 3 years old or less
Union-prevailing rates, 3 yrs old or less75%Nov. 12, 2010
Nonunion-prevailing rates, 3 yrs old or less36%Nov. 12, 2010
Nonunion-prevailing rates, 10+ yrs old46%Nov. 12, 2010

By 2018, that gap had calcified into rates that were decades old. The Department of Labor's own Inspector General found that of 134,738 unique published wage rates in Labor's system as of September 2018, 3% — roughly 4,000 rates, the majority of them nonunion — hadn't been revised in 21 to 40 years, some untouched since between 1978 and 1997. The traced real contracts built on them: a federal solicitation in May 2017 carried a nonunion wage rate last updated in 1988; a $140 million Texas construction contract awarded in fiscal year 2013 used nonunion rates also last set in 1988; a New York contract worth $100,000 to $250,000 in fiscal year 2017 did the same. Puerto Rico spent $38.2 million on covered construction between 2014 and 2017 under a wage determination last revised in 1995 — a rate the found was still unchanged as of December 2018. Zoomed out, the disparity from 2010 hadn't closed: 10% of nonunion wage rates were more than 10 years old, compared with less than 1% of union rates. The Inspector General made eight recommendations; Labor agreed with all of them.

The fix, and the fight to undo the whole thing

In August 2023, Labor finalized its first comprehensive overhaul of the Davis-Bacon regulations in nearly 40 years, aimed partly at the 's findings — allowing adoption of qualifying state and local prevailing-wage data, and expanding coverage to close gaps the agency said contractors were exploiting. Enforcement narrowed this year: on June 24, 2026, a federal judge in the Northern District of Texas vacated three of that rule's expansions — coverage of onsite materials suppliers, coverage of delivery truck drivers, and retroactive application to contracts that omitted the required wage clauses — after the Trump administration's Labor Department settled litigation brought by the Associated General Contractors of America rather than keep defending them. The Act itself, and most of the 2023 rule, remain in force.

Then, in April 2026, Sen. Mike Lee and six co-sponsors introduced the Davis-Bacon Repeal Act, calling the 95-year-old law "an antiquated piece of legislation that hurts middle class workers." Its evidence is the 's $17.8 billion, 10-year outlay-reduction estimate — a figure itself attributes mostly to lower pay for the same 1.2 million workers the law was written to protect, not to fewer contracts or less construction. The survey system that sets their floor has been flagged as stale and unrepresentative in federal audits from 2004, 2011, and 2019 alike; the bill does not propose to fix it. It proposes to remove it.

The takeaway

  • The floor is real: $217 billion a year, 1.2 million workers. Those are Labor's own coverage figures, not advocacy estimates from either side of the repeal fight.
  • The mechanism setting that floor has failed the same audit three times. Federal reviewers in 2004, 2011, and 2019 each found the underlying wage data stale, unrepresentative, or both — most recently rates untouched for up to 40 years.
  • The repeal bill's headline number is a pay cut, by 's own description. $17.8 billion in projected 10-year savings comes "mostly" from lower wages and benefits for covered workers, not from administrative efficiency.

Coverage and worker figures are the Department of Labor's 2023 estimate; wage-rate currency and representativeness data reflect 's November 2010 snapshot and the Inspector General's September 2018 snapshot — the most recent point-in-time audits either agency has published.

Sources

  • U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division, Updating the Davis-Bacon and Related Acts Regulations, final rule, 88 Fed. Reg. 57526 (Aug. 23, 2023) — source of the $217 billion annual construction coverage and 1.2 million covered-worker estimates, and the 2023 reform package. federalregister.gov
  • U.S. Government Accountability Office, Davis-Bacon Act: Methodological Changes Needed to Improve Wage Survey (-11-152, Mar. 2011) — the 63%-union-prevailing-vs.-14%-unionized comparison, the 3-year currency rates by type, and the 2004 error-rate finding. gao.gov
  • U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General, Determined That WHD Needs to Improve the Timeliness and Accuracy of Davis-Bacon Act Prevailing Wage Rates (Report No. 04-19-001-15-001, 2019) — the 134,738-rate audit, the 21-to-40-year-old rate findings, the Texas, New York, and Puerto Rico contract examples, and the union/nonunion 10-year staleness gap. oig.dol.gov
  • Congressional Budget Office, Repeal the Davis-Bacon Act, budget option (updated 2026) — the $17.8 billion 10-year outlay-reduction estimate and 's finding that the savings are mostly wage and benefit reductions. cbo.gov
  • Office of Sen. Mike Lee, press release announcing the Davis-Bacon Repeal Act (Apr. 30, 2026) — bill sponsors, introduction date, and the senator's stated rationale. lee.senate.gov
  • Ogletree Deakins, press release on the Northern District of Texas ruling vacating three provisions of the 2023 Davis-Bacon rule (June 24, 2026) — case outcome and the scope of what was and wasn't vacated. ogletree.com
Weekly digest: the most-read systems, in brief. Mondays.

Comments

Always open. Logged-in readers can annotate paragraphs in place.

Loading comments…
or log in to comment under your account