Fewer children are in foster care. The caseworkers who run it still can't stay.
Summary
The number of U.S. children in foster care has fallen 18.6% since 2020, to 331,747 — even as the $10.5 billion federal program funding their care shifts money toward adoption and prevention. The one number that hasn't moved: caseworker turnover, stuck between 20% and 40% a year for decades.
Follow the dollar
Title IV-E doesn't run through an annual appropriations fight the way housing or nutrition programs do — it's mandatory spending that scales automatically with how many eligible children states claim. That gives it a different failure mode than a program that can hit a funding cliff: it can't run out, but Congress and can quietly redirect where the formula sends money.
View data as table
| Foster Care Maintenance payments | $5,298M | largest category, but shrinking |
|---|---|---|
| Adoption Assistance payments | $4,397M | second-largest, growing |
| Kinship Guardianship Assistance | $386M | growing |
| Prevention Services (Family First Act) | $203M | growing fastest, off a small base |
| Chafee Foster Care (general grant) | $143M | flat |
| Education & Training Vouchers | $44M | flat |
| Kinship Navigator program | $16M | flat |
That's exactly what's happening. Per the Congressional Research Service's analysis of federal child welfare funding, Foster Care Maintenance payments — the money that pays for a child's actual room, board, and supervision while in care — are on a three-year slide: $5.354 billion in FY2025, an estimated $5.298 billion in FY2026, and a requested $5.123 billion in FY2027. Adoption Assistance is moving the opposite direction, from $4.136 billion to $4.397 billion to a requested $4.485 billion over the same span. Prevention Services — in-home help meant to keep a child out of foster care altogether, created by the 2018 Family First Prevention Services Act — is growing fastest of all in percentage terms, from $170 million to $203 million to a requested $229 million. Fewer children are entering care in the first place: 175,008 did in federal fiscal year 2025, down from 216,450 in FY2020, per the Administration for Children and Families' AFCARS dashboard. The formula is quietly re-weighting itself toward keeping families together and toward permanency after care, and away from paying for care itself.
The same system, counted in people
None of that reallocation touches the workforce problem, because Title IV-E funds placements and subsidies, not headcount. The number of children the system has to track fell from 407,332 in care on September 30, 2020 to 331,747 on September 30, 2025 — an 18.6% drop — per the same AFCARS dashboard. Even so, 175,008 children entered care and 169,927 exited during federal fiscal year 2025 alone, and 15,030 of those exits were kids aging out of the system at 18 or older without ever being reunified, adopted, or placed with a guardian — 9% of everyone who left.
View data as table
| Job stress & worker burnout | 74.9% | n=59 supervisors reporting increased turnover |
|---|---|---|
| Better pay & job prospects elsewhere | 44.6% | |
| Workload | 41.3% |
The federal government's own workforce study, the NSCAW III Workforce Study, found that 53.3% of supervisors said turnover among their caseworkers had increased between March 2019 and June 2022, and asked them why. Job stress and burnout topped the list at 74.9%, ahead of better pay elsewhere (44.6%) and workload (41.3%). That same report notes that child welfare agencies have been estimated to run 20% to 40% annual turnover for at least the fifteen years before the pandemic — this isn't a new emergency, it's a baseline the system has never gotten below.
The federal government also just loosened one of its few levers over the consequence of that churn. Since FY2015, states have been required to complete monthly in-person visits for at least 95% of children in foster care or face a cut in their federal cost-share. Effective this fiscal year, the Supporting America's Children and Families Act (P.L. 118-258) eliminated that funding penalty — the 95% target stays on the books, but states that miss it because they can't staff enough caseworkers no longer lose federal money over it.
The takeaway
- The money is a formula, not a fight. Title IV-E is mandatory spending that scales with claims, so it can't hit a funding cliff the way discretionary programs do — but Congress can still redirect where the formula points, and it's actively doing so: away from paying for care, toward paying to avoid or resolve it.
- The child population is shrinking; the workforce problem isn't. Children in foster care are down 18.6% since 2020, yet the system still processed 175,008 entries and 169,927 exits in a single year, run by a caseworker corps whose turnover hasn't budged from a 20-40% range in decades.
- Burnout, not the budget, is the binding constraint. Supervisors point to job stress before they point to pay — and the one federal accountability lever tied to caseworker capacity, the monthly-visit funding penalty, was just switched off.
Dollar figures are the Congressional Research Service's FY2026 comparable estimate of mandatory Title IV-E spending under current law, not an enacted appropriation; component figures may be revised as actual claims come in. Foster care population and entry/exit figures are preliminary AFCARS estimates for federal fiscal year 2025 as of February 27, 2026, and are subject to revision as states submit corrected data.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service — Child Welfare Funding in the President's FY2027 Budget: In Brief (R48912, 2026), the source for all Title IV-E and Title IV-B category-level funding figures and the FY2025–FY2027 spending trend. congress.gov (mirror)
- Administration for Children and Families, Children's Bureau — The AFCARS Dashboard, Preliminary FFY 2025 Estimates (release No. 33, as of Feb. 27, 2026) — children entering, exiting, and in foster care, and the 2020–2025 trend. acf.gov
- Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation — NSCAW III Workforce Study: Reasons for Child Welfare Caseworker Turnover from 2021 to 2022 (OPRE Report #2025-009, Feb. 2025) — turnover reasons and the 20–40% historical turnover-rate estimate. acf.gov
- Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation — Snapshot of the Child Welfare Workforce from 2021 to 2022: Caseworker Experiences Working in the Child Welfare System (OPRE Report #2025-040, June 2025) — supporting context on caseworker well-being and job commitment. acf.gov
- Congressional Research Service — Child Welfare and Child Support: The Supporting America's Children and Families Act (P.L. 118-258) (R48503) — the removal of the monthly caseworker-visit funding penalty, effective FY2026. congress.gov
Comments
Always open. Logged-in readers can annotate paragraphs in place.
American foster care is, at bottom, two systems layered on top of each other. One is a funding formula: a federal entitlement, Title IV-E of the Social Security Act, that pays states for every eligible child's maintenance, adoption subsidy, or guardianship support, no appropriation cap required. The other is a workforce: the caseworkers who investigate reports, place children, and write the court filings that formula depends on. In 2026 the first system is shrinking and rebalancing. The second hasn't moved in a generation.