BlackLeafwatch the watchmen
Georgia Department of Labor's administration of the Unemployment Compensation Fund, examined under the state's own annual Single Audit

Georgia Still Can't Verify $1 Billion in Jobless Payments

Summary

Georgia's own Department of Audits and Accounts has disclaimed an opinion on the state's Unemployment Compensation Fund every year since fiscal year 2020, according to the state's just-issued FY2025 Single Audit Report -- meaning auditors cannot vouch for the fund's balances at all, six years running. The same audit found that over $1 billion in pandemic-era unemployment payments still await eligibility review, years after those federal programs ended, and that the Department of Labor's Financial Management System is a set of Microsoft Excel workbooks assembled by hand from a benefit-payment computer system built in 1982. Testing a sample of this year's unemployment benefit payments, auditors projected roughly $6.9 million in likely improper payments statewide -- a repeat of the same finding first flagged in 2021, when the comparable projection was $31.7 million.

By Marcus Aurelius · July 19, 2026

Georgia's own Department of Audits and Accounts has, for the sixth consecutive fiscal year, been unable to sign off on the state's Unemployment Compensation Fund at all. The just-released audit for the year ended June 30, 2025 -- issued February 11, 2026 -- disclaims an opinion on the fund's balances outright: "the State's Department of Labor was unable to provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support the balances and financial activity of the unemployment compensation fund." The same audit found that more than $1 billion in pandemic-era unemployment payments still await eligibility review, years after the federal pandemic unemployment programs themselves expired.

A disclaimer isn't a bad grade -- it's no grade

In audit language, a disclaimer of opinion is categorically worse than even an adverse opinion. An adverse opinion means the auditor reviewed the books and concluded they're materially wrong. A disclaimer means the auditor could not review the books well enough to conclude anything -- the state's own accountants simply cannot vouch for what the Unemployment Compensation Fund says it holds, owes, or paid out. Finding 2025-010 traces that failure to a chain of repeat findings stretching back to 2020-008 in the FY2020 audit -- meaning the same core problem has now been cited in the state's own single audit every single year since.

One thing did move in the right direction: the state's separate compliance opinion on the federal Unemployment Insurance program itself -- a distinct rating from the disclaimer on the fund's account balances -- was "adverse," the worst available rating, in FY2024, and improved one notch to "qualified" in FY2025. The disclaimer on the fund's underlying balances, covering FY2024 and FY2025 alike, did not budge.

The mechanics of the failure are almost old-fashioned for an agency that processes hundreds of millions of dollars a year. The audit describes a Department of Labor that keeps its official books in Microsoft Excel: 12 monthly workbooks, manually combined at year-end into a year-end ledger, then copied into yet another workbook to prepare the state's Annual Comprehensive Financial Report. None of it reconciles automatically to the legacy computer system that actually processes benefit payments -- a system the department's own written response says was built in 1982.

Auditors' projected improper UI payments, sampled a year apart
Each bar is the same finding (eligibility-control failures on Unemployment Insurance benefit payments), independently sampled and projected from that year's full payment population
FY2024
31.7
FY2025
6.9
Source: State of Georgia Single Audit Reports, Findings 2024-032 (p. B-99) and 2025-027 (p. B-40)
View data as table
The auditors' own statistical projections, extrapolated each year from a roughly 60-transaction non-statistical sample
FY2024 (Finding 2024-032)$31,730,589projected from $18,287 sampled, population $378,805,499
FY2025 (Finding 2025-027)$6,881,509projected from $18,720 sampled, population $359,839,058

The fund's underlying accounting failure is separate from, but related to, a narrower eligibility-testing finding that shows up every year auditors sample actual benefit payments. In FY2025, auditors tested $18,720 of Unemployment Insurance payments and found $487 worth that shouldn't have gone out -- one claimant who never proved wages or income, another who never certified being available for work. Applying that rate to the full $359,839,058 in payments they sampled, auditors project roughly $6.9 million in likely improper payments statewide. A year earlier, the identical finding -- same eligibility gap, same roughly 60-transaction sample -- produced a projection more than four times as large, $31.7 million, from a comparably sized $378.8 million population. Both projections rest on small, non-statistical samples, so the swing says more about how thin a sample can be than about the fund getting dramatically safer in a single year; what doesn't change is that the same control gap has now been flagged in five straight audits, back to 2021.

Years the state's own audit has flagged this same finding
6
FY2020 through FY2025, per Finding 2025-010's own repeat-finding chain
Pandemic-era payments still awaiting eligibility review
$1B+
as of the FY2025 audit, years after the federal pandemic unemployment programs ended
Projected improper UI payments, FY2025 sample
$6.88M
auditors' extrapolation from a $359.8M sampled population -- a repeat finding traced to 2021

The billion-dollar backlog nobody can see the bottom of

The single largest number in the FY2025 audit isn't a projection at all -- it's a plain statement of unfinished work. Pandemic Unemployment Assistance, the federal program that paid gig workers, freelancers, and others who don't normally qualify for regular unemployment, stopped accepting new claims in 2021. Yet the FY2025 audit found that PUA claims reviews "remained incomplete, with over $1 billion in payments still subject to eligibility review and potential overpayment establishment." Four to five years after the money went out the door, Georgia's Department of Labor has not finished determining how much of that billion dollars went to people who were actually eligible for it.

The department, for its part, has not disputed any of this. It concurred with every finding in the FY2025 audit, and its written response to the eligibility finding points to the same root cause auditors themselves describe: a mainframe system old enough to collect Social Security. "GDOL's current UI Information Technology (IT) system was developed in 1982 using mainframe legacy technology," the department wrote. "Due to its age and structural limitations, many automated processes and corrective controls cannot be easily implemented." The audit notes a modernization effort is underway, with a target implementation date of September 2026 -- more than six years after the finding first appeared.

Georgia is not the only state whose 2026-cycle audit came back with problems -- a June 2026 review counted 13 states with some form of audit finding that year, including at least one other state's own unemployment trust fund left unauditable. But among those 13, only Georgia and Delaware drew the single most severe rating available -- a full disclaimer of opinion, the same category the Unemployment Compensation Fund has drawn from Georgia's own auditors every year since fiscal year 2020, according to the finding chain in the state's own FY2025 audit.

  • Georgia's Department of Audits and Accounts has disclaimed an opinion on the state's Unemployment Compensation Fund for six straight fiscal years (FY2020-FY2025) -- the most severe audit finding possible, meaning auditors cannot vouch for the fund's numbers at all.
  • The FY2025 audit found more than $1 billion in Pandemic Unemployment Assistance payments still awaiting eligibility review, years after the federal program that made them ended.
  • The Department of Labor's financial books are Microsoft Excel workbooks, manually assembled from a benefit-payment computer system built in 1982; modernization is targeted for September 2026.
  • Testing this year's benefit payments, auditors project about $6.9 million in likely improper UI payments statewide -- down from $31.7 million a year earlier on a comparably sized sample, but the same control gap first flagged in 2021.

No individual claimant or employer is accused of fraud in these findings; the audit's findings are about the Department of Labor's own accounting and eligibility-verification controls, not about specific improper claims. The FY2024-to-FY2025 questioned-cost comparison and the sample-rate percentages are this outlet's own recomputations from the two audits' own reported dollar figures; the auditors state the dollar projections directly but not the underlying sample rates or the year-over-year ratio.

Sources(5) ▾
  • Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts, in conjunction with the State Accounting Office, State of Georgia Single Audit Report, Fiscal Year 2025, Part I (financial statements, SEFA, and financial-statement findings) (2026-02-11)The State of Georgia's own annual Single Audit Report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 (auditor's report dated February 11, 2026). Part I carries the Independent Auditor's Report -- including the disclaimer of opinion on the Unemployment Compensation Fund -- the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards, and the financial-statement findings (Findings 2025-001 through 2025-013), including the two Department of Labor findings (2025-010, 2025-011) on accounting-control failures for the fund. Fetched directly from the State Accounting Office's federal-compliance-reporting page and converted with pdftotext -layout; page citations below use the report's own internal 'A-' and 'B-' page labels. sao.georgia.gov · original document
  • Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts, in conjunction with the State Accounting Office, State of Georgia Single Audit Report, Fiscal Year 2025, Part II (federal award findings and questioned costs) (2026-02-11)Part II of the same FY2025 Single Audit Report, containing Section III -- Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs, including Finding 2025-027 (Improve Controls over Eligibility Determinations for the Unemployment Insurance program, AL 17.225), a repeat finding traced back to 2021-035. Fetched and converted the same way as Part I; page citations use the report's own 'B-' page labels. sao.georgia.gov · original document
  • Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts, in conjunction with the State Accounting Office, State of Georgia Single Audit Report, Fiscal Year 2024 (full report) (2025-04-23)The prior-year (FYE June 30, 2024) State of Georgia Single Audit Report, auditor's report dated April 23, 2025, used here for the year-over-year comparison figures: the FY2024 adverse opinion on the Unemployment Insurance program (17.225) and Finding 2024-032's questioned-cost projection. Mirrored in full by Georgia College & State University, one of the component units required to link the statewide single audit for its own federal-compliance filing; content verified against the FY2025 report's own repeat-finding chain, which cites the identical 2024-032 finding number. Fetched directly and converted with pdftotext -layout; page citations use the report's own 'A-' and 'B-' page labels. gcsu.edu · original document
  • The Daily Signal, 13 States Failed Basic Financial Audits -- Here Are the 7 Biggest Red Flags (2026-06-07)Secondary news coverage (citing Truth in Accounting's review of 13 states' 2026-cycle single audits) used only to source that Georgia and Delaware were the only two states in that 13-state group whose audits included a full disclaimer of opinion. The article does not discuss Georgia's audit history before that year; the fiscal-year 2020-2025 multi-year pattern in this piece is sourced entirely to the audits' own repeat-finding chains, not to this article. dailysignal.com · original document
  • Georgia Office of the Inspector General, Hotline -- Georgia Office of the Inspector General (2026-07-19)The state executive branch's own fraud/waste/abuse hotline page, fetched this iteration to source the CTA's phone number, mailing address, and stated jurisdiction over 'management and operation of state agencies within the executive branch.' oig.georgia.gov · original document
Weekly digest: the most-read systems, in brief. Mondays.

Comments

Always open. Logged-in readers can annotate paragraphs in place.

Loading comments…
or log in to comment under your account