Hawaii's Tourism Agency Finished 4 of 200 'Hotspot' Fixes It Funded
Summary
A Hawaii State Auditor report found the Hawai'i Tourism Authority spent $75.1 million since 2019 on 'destination management' -- the strategy it adopted in 2020 to address overtourism -- with no substantive funding increase and no reliable way to measure whether any of it worked. Of the $19.7 million HTA spent standing up three-year 'Destination Management Action Plans' across all six islands, only 26 of 200 planned sub-actions addressed the visitor-resident 'hotspots' the plans existed to fix, and just 4 were confirmed complete before the plans expired. It is the sixth time since 2002 a state audit has found HTA's contracting or oversight deficient, and this time HTA did not dispute a single finding.
A plan to fix 97 'hotspots' finished 4
Inside that six-year total sits a more specific effort: between December 2020 and July 2021, HTA's board approved six island-level 'Destination Management Action Plans,' or DMAPs -- three-year plans covering O'ahu, Hawai'i Island, Kaua'i, Maui, Moloka'i, and Lāna'i, built around 'hotspots,' defined in each plan as sites where visitor crowding degrades the experience for both tourists and residents. HTA reported spending $19,703,235 standing up the DMAP contracts themselves⧉ -- about 26% of the full six-year destination-management total, concentrated in three of those years. The plans laid out 52 overarching actions broken into 200 specific sub-actions⧉.
The auditor checked how many of those 200 sub-actions actually targeted a hotspot -- a visitor/resident friction point, the entire premise of the plans -- and found just 26, or 13%, did⧉. Of those 26, only 4 -- 2% of all 200 -- were marked complete in HTA's own tracker by the time the three-year plans ran out⧉. On O'ahu, one action called for identifying and stewarding key hotspots; of its seven sub-actions, one was completed, two were in progress, and four had never been started⧉ -- and the auditor noted that the one 'completed' item was credited for holding meetings, without HTA ever naming which sites the meetings identified.
View data as table
| FY2019 | 11,177,060 | |
|---|---|---|
| FY2020 | 16,247,834 | |
| FY2021 | 8,303,256 | |
| FY2022 | 16,419,095 | |
| FY2023 | 12,072,007 | |
| FY2024 | 10,894,902 | HTA's 2020 strategic plan made destination management its stated top priority; the audit found spending never showed a substantive increase |
Decisions handed to contractors, then never checked
The audit's second finding explains why so little of the money produced hotspot fixes: HTA 'expedited' the DMAP process and delegated the decisions that mattered -- who sat on each island's steering committee, which actions got funded, how progress would be tracked -- to outside contractors and the committees themselves, without a documented framework for any of it. HTA stopped publishing DMAP progress reports in mid-2022, two years before the plans were due to finish⧉, and its remaining tracking 'involved little more than filling out a to-do list' before the Authority stopped tracking altogether. In one O'ahu example, HTA credited progress on a stewardship sub-action partly by pointing to more than $1 million in unrelated community-grant funds⧉ -- when the auditor asked which hotspot projects that money funded, HTA said the grants weren't required to address hotspots at all.
View data as table
| Total DMAP sub-actions planned | 200 | Across 52 overarching actions and six island plans, meant to 'rebuild, redefine and reset' each island's tourism direction over three years |
|---|---|---|
| Sub-actions that addressed a 'hotspot' | 26 | 13% -- the plans identified 97 hotspots where visitors and residents compete for access |
| Hotspot sub-actions completed | 4 | 2% -- confirmed done in HTA's own tracker by the time the three-year plans concluded |
The sixth audit to find the same thing
This is not a new pattern for HTA. Hawaii's State Auditor has now examined HTA's contracts, management, or major agreements six times since 2002⧉ -- report after report finding weak contract oversight, missing written policies, and inadequate monitoring. A 2003 audit, for comparison, found a separate HTA marketing predecessor had spent $151.7 million with 'no identifiable benefit to the State' -- a much older figure from a different report, not part of the current $75.1 million total, but evidence the pattern predates the current DMAP program by two decades. This time, HTA's written response did not dispute a single finding, conclusion, or statement in the audit⧉; the Auditor's office, in turn, wrote that the DMAP process was 'rushed, delegated almost entirely to consultants without meaningful HTA oversight.'
The Auditor's recommendations set the baseline HTA has now agreed to meet: future strategic plans need measurable targets with specific starting points, and HTA must report its own progress against them annually -- the tracking discipline the current DMAPs never had. HTA told the Auditor the fixes are already underway through organizational restructuring and 'enhanced performance tracking,' but no recommendation carries a statutory deadline⧉; the Auditor's office says only that it will independently check HTA's progress in two to three years.
- HTA spent $75,114,154 on destination management from FY2019-FY2024, a figure the audit found never substantively increased despite becoming the Authority's stated top strategic priority in 2020.
- Of the $19,703,235 HTA spent standing up its six island 'hotspot' fix plans (DMAPs), only 26 of 200 planned sub-actions (13%) addressed a hotspot at all, and only 4 (2%) were confirmed complete before the three-year plans expired.
- The audit found HTA delegated the DMAPs' key decisions to outside contractors and steering committees, stopped publishing progress reports in mid-2022, and eventually stopped tracking DMAP activity altogether.
- This is the sixth Hawaii State Auditor report since 2002 to find deficient contracting or oversight at HTA; this time HTA did not dispute any finding, and the Auditor set no deadline beyond an independent recheck in two to three years.
All figures come from the Hawaii Office of the Auditor's Audit of the Hawai'i Tourism Authority (Report No. 25-07, April 2025), including Exhibit 2 (destination-management spending), Exhibit 4 (DMAP contract spending), Exhibit 5 and the surrounding hotspot analysis (sub-action completion), Appendix A (prior-audit history), and the Auditor's formal response to HTA's comments. This piece independently recomputed the $75,114,154 six-year total and the $19,703,235 DMAP-contract total from the report's own line items, the 13% and 2% hotspot/completion shares, destination-management spending as roughly 0.4% of the $20 billion Hawaii visitor economy the audit itself cites, and DMAP contract spending as about 26% of the full six-year destination-management total -- all reproducible from figures stated directly in the report. The 2003 audit's $151.7 million figure describes a different, decades-earlier finding about a predecessor marketing relationship and is not combined with any current-year total in this piece.
Sources(1) ▾
- Office of the Auditor, State of Hawai‘i, Audit of the Hawai‘i Tourism Authority (Report No. 25-07) (2025-04-01) — The primary document -- the Hawai‘i State Auditor's statutory management and financial audit of the Hawai‘i Tourism Authority (HTA), conducted under Section 23-13, HRS, which requires an audit of HTA's contracts over $15 million at least every five years. Source for every dollar figure, the Destination Management Action Plan (DMAP) spending and hotspot-completion figures, the prior-audit history in Appendix A, and HTA's own written response. files.hawaii.gov · original document
Comments
Always open. Logged-in readers can annotate paragraphs in place.
Hawaii's State Auditor⧉ -- an office the state constitution makes independent of the governor specifically so it can audit executive agencies without interference -- found the Hawai'i Tourism Authority (HTA), the state agency that markets Hawaii to visitors and is supposed to manage tourism's strain on residents, spent $75,114,154 on 'destination management' between fiscal 2019 and 2024. That is the category HTA's own 2020 strategic plan made its central focus, after years of residents souring on tourism. The audit found the money never represented a substantive increase, and HTA still cannot say whether any of it worked, because the agency lacks the policies, milestones, or tracking to measure its own progress⧉.