BlackLeafwatch the watchmen
Federal Historic Preservation Tax Incentives

The Federal Government Refunds 20 Cents of Every Historic-Rehab Dollar. The Trades to Spend It Are Running Short.

Summary

The National Park Service certified $8.64 billion in historic-building rehabilitation as complete in fiscal 2025 — entitling owners to a 20% federal tax credit worth roughly $1.73 billion, per its newest annual report. A 2022 national labor study found historic-preservation experts rating plumbers/electricians, building inspectors, and landscapers with restoration skills in shortage or worse in 69–79% of responses.

By Vindex · July 11, 2026

Ford Motor Company spent $377 million rehabilitating Michigan Central Station in Detroit — a Beaux-Arts train depot abandoned for 30 years, vandalized, and once slated for demolition — into a technology hub that reopened in 2024. That project ran through the same federal system every historic rehabilitation in the country runs through: an application process administered by the National Park Service, a 20% credit against the cost of the work, and a state historic-preservation office checking that the result still looks like the building it was. The system moved $8.64 billion through that process in fiscal 2025 alone. The people who can actually do the work — the plumbers, electricians, and inspectors who know how to touch a 100-year-old building without ruining it — are a separate, much tighter market.

Certified rehab. spending, FY2025
$8.64B
939 completed projects, NPS
Federal tax credit value
$1.73B
20% of QRE, claimed over 5 years
Inspectors rated in shortage
78.6%
of historic-trades experts surveyed

How the 20 cents gets paid

The Federal Historic Preservation Tax Incentives Program, run by the National Park Service with the 50 State Historic Preservation Offices, works in three steps. Part 1 certifies that a building is historic — 1,387 of those certifications were filed in fiscal 2025. Part 2 is a preliminary review of the rehabilitation plan itself; 1,170 were approved, covering an estimated $13.10 billion in planned work. Part 3 certifies the work as actually completed to preservation standards — 939 projects cleared that bar in FY2025, with a final, audited construction cost of $8,636,796,948 in Qualified Rehabilitation Expenditures (QRE). That completed-QRE figure is what the credit is calculated against.

Under IRC §47, an owner who completes a certified rehabilitation may claim a tax credit equal to 20% of QRE — not in the year the building reopens, but ratably, one-fifth at a time, over the five years starting when it's placed back in service, a change made by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Applied to FY2025's completed projects, that 20% works out to $1,727,359,390 in federal credit value, against $6,909,437,558 the owner still has to finance from private capital, debt, or (in 39 states) a stacked state historic tax credit.

Where FY2025's certified rehabilitation dollar goes
Completed (Part 3) Qualified Rehabilitation Expenditures, fiscal year 2025, $
Certified rehab. spending (QRE)$8.6BFederal 20% tax credit$1.7BOwner-financed remainder$6.9B
Source: National Park Service, Technical Preservation Services, FY2025 Annual Report (March 2026)
View data as table
FY2025 certified rehab. spending vs. federal credit
Certified rehab. spending, FY2025$8,636,796,948939 completed (Part 3) projects
Federal 20% tax credit$1,727,359,39020% of QRE, IRC §47
Owner-financed remainder$6,909,437,558Remaining 80% of QRE

Median completed-project QRE in FY2025 was $2.00 million; the average, pulled upward by projects like Michigan Central, was $9.20 million. Since the program's first year in 1977, it has certified 51,055 projects and $135.76 billion in rehabilitation investment, producing 329,548 rehabilitated and 377,293 new housing units — 216,892 of them low- or moderate-income.

It isn't evenly spread

Completed rehabilitation spending by state, FY2025
Estimated QRE at project completion (Part 3), $
New York
$2B
Ohio
$549.1M
Illinois
$495.4M
Texas
$485.2M
Virginia
$405.1M
Massachusetts
$396M
California
$391M
Pennsylvania
$233.4M
All other jurisdictions
$3.6B
Source: NPS/TPS, FY2025 Annual Report, state-by-state project-activity table
View data as table
FY2025 completed QRE by state
New York$2,046,498,754
Ohio$549,091,198
Illinois$495,369,102
Texas$485,201,363
Virginia$405,070,815
Massachusetts$396,005,290
California$391,007,655
Pennsylvania$233,366,186
All other jurisdictions$3,635,186,58548 states, DC, PR, USVI combined

New York alone accounted for $2.05 billion of the $8.64 billion national total — nearly a quarter of it, and more than the next three states combined. Ohio, Illinois, Texas, Virginia, Massachusetts, California, and Pennsylvania round out the rest of the top eight, together adding another $2.96 billion. The other 48 states, DC, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands split the remaining $3.64 billion. It's a program that runs through every state historic preservation office in the country, but the dollar volume concentrates in states with the deepest inventory of income-producing historic buildings and, often, their own stacking state credit.

The workforce the credit assumes exists

None of that $8.64 billion gets spent without someone who actually knows how to repair a Guastavino tile ceiling or rewire a building without gutting its plaster. That labor market is a separate system from the tax credit, and the most detailed national look at it — a 2022 study by PlaceEconomics for The Campaign for Historic Trades, a workforce initiative of Preservation Maryland working with the National Park Service's Historic Preservation Training Center — found it strained everywhere it looked. Rehabilitation of existing buildings represents nearly $85 billion a year industry-wide (about 19% of building construction) and employs 1.3 million workers. Of the roughly 165,000 jobs historic rehabilitation activity creates annually, the study estimated nearly 100,000 are jobs for which specific historic-preservation skills, training, and experience "would be desirable" — a specialization most of the general construction workforce doesn't carry. The supply problem compounds: 40% of America's 96 million buildings are already at least 50 years old, and another 13.3 million will cross that threshold in the next decade.

Historic-trades experts rating labor availability 'shortage' or 'severe shortage'
Survey of historic-trades employers, by occupation, 2022
Plumber / electrician
77.7%
Building inspector
78.6%
Landscaper
68.9%
Source: PlaceEconomics for The Campaign for Historic Trades, 'Status of Historic Trades in America' (July 2022), pp.26–28
View data as table
Share of experts rating trade in shortage or severe shortage
Plumber / electrician77.7%rated shortage or severe shortage; $40.23/hr, +7.8% premium
Building inspector78.6%rated shortage or severe shortage; $40.99/hr, +8.0% premium
Landscaper68.9%rated shortage or severe shortage; $31.46/hr, +6.5% premium

Historic-preservation plumbers and electricians earned a weighted-average $40.23 an hour and a 7.8% wage premium over new-construction work in the same trade — yet 77.7% of surveyed historic-trades experts still rated the labor supply "shortage" or "severe shortage." Building inspectors with preservation training, at $40.99 an hour, scored worse: 78.6%. Even landscapers, the least-strained of the three trades studied, came in at 68.9%. For plumbing and electrical work specifically, the study estimated 27,596 to 36,794 jobs nationally required historic-preservation expertise in 2022, projected to grow to 35,514–47,352 by 2030 — a specialization the wage premium is not yet large enough to fully solve.

The takeaway

  • The credit is a clean 20%, but the delivery is slow. Since 2018, the federal historic tax credit is claimed in five equal annual slices, not a lump sum — a five-year financing gap owners plan around, not a one-time refund.
  • The money concentrates; the shortage doesn't. New York alone drew nearly a quarter of FY2025's $8.64 billion in certified rehabilitation, but the 2022 labor study found trade shortages rated at 69% or worse in every specialty it examined nationwide, regardless of where the projects were.
  • A wage premium exists and hasn't closed the gap. Historic-trades plumbers, electricians, and inspectors already earn 6.5–8.0% more than their new-construction counterparts. Experts still call the labor supply short or severely short in roughly three cases out of four.

Federal figures cover fiscal year 2025 (Oct. 2024–Sep. 2025) as reported by the National Park Service; labor-market figures are drawn from a 2022 national study, the most recent nationwide historic-trades labor survey publicly available, and were not re-derived or updated to 2025 dollars.

Sources

  • National Park Service, Technical Preservation Services — Federal Tax Incentives for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings: Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2025 (March 2026, REV) — FY2025 certification counts, completed QRE, state-by-state breakdown, program-to-date totals, and the Michigan Central Station case study (carried over from the FY2024 edition). nps.gov
  • National Park Service, Technical Preservation Services — Federal Tax Incentives for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings: Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2024 (March 2025) — source for the $377 million Michigan Central Station rehabilitation case study. nps.gov
  • Internal Revenue Service — Rehabilitation Credit (historic preservation) FAQs — the statutory basis for the 20% credit rate (IRC §47) and the ratable five-year claiming period established by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. irs.gov
  • PlaceEconomics, prepared for The Campaign for Historic Trades (a Preservation Maryland initiative with the National Park Service's Historic Preservation Training Center) — Status of Historic Trades in America (July 2022) — the source for national rehabilitation-economy sizing, the 165,000-jobs/100,000-specialized-jobs estimate, building-age data, and the trade-by-trade wage and labor-availability figures. historictrades.org
Weekly digest: the most-read systems, in brief. Mondays.

Comments

Always open. Logged-in readers can annotate paragraphs in place.

Loading comments…
or log in to comment under your account