The referee for federal layoffs is buried in the case load the layoffs created
Summary
MSPB received 20,335 appeals in fiscal 2025 — four times a normal year — as agencies fired probationary staff and ran reductions in force. The White House's FY2027 budget proposes giving the board $5 million less than it got the year before.
The queue
's own numbers show the mismatch plainly. In fiscal 2025 the board received 20,335 initial appeals — "more than four times" its typical annual workload, per its Annual Performance Report for FY 2025. Its regional and field offices closed 9,050 cases that year, and even that was a strain: only 55.8% of initial appeals were resolved within the board's own 120-day target. The gap between what comes in and what goes out becomes a stock, not just a flow — and a second bottleneck compounds it. From April 10 to October 27, 2025, Acting Chairman Henry Kerner was 's only sitting member, so the board lacked the quorum of two required to issue final decisions on petitions for review. By the time a second member was sworn in, roughly 1,037 cases were sitting at headquarters waiting for a vote that legally could not happen.
View data as table
| Appeals received | 20,335 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Cases processed, regional & field offices | 9,050 | FY2025 |
| Cases pending at HQ awaiting a quorum | 1,037 | Sept. 30, 2025 |
None of this means the board's decisions are bad ones — when the Federal Circuit reviewed rulings on appeal in FY2025, it affirmed the board 91% of the time. The problem isn't the verdicts. It's the wait to get one.
Fewer people, same mission
The caseload quadrupled into an agency that had already been shrinking for years. had 214 full-time employees in FY2018; it "currently stands at only 159 FTEs," per its FY 2027 Congressional Budget Justification, filed in April 2026. A governmentwide hiring freeze that began in January 2025 cost 16 hiring actions that were already in motion — the agency went from 183 employees on board to 163, per the same Annual Performance Report, which also notes that 18% of remaining staff are eligible to retire before the end of FY2027. The President's FY2027 budget would fund 162 FTEs — a handful more than today, but nowhere near the 214 the agency ran with before any of this started, and below the 183 says it actually needs.
View data as table
| FY2018 staff (FTEs) | 214 | |
|---|---|---|
| Current staff (FTEs) | 159 | As of April 2026 |
| FY2027 request supports | 162 | President's Budget request |
The money
is a small independent agency with a statutory right most agencies don't have: if it disagrees with the number puts in the President's Budget, it can submit its own request directly to Congress — a "bypass budget." It used that authority this year. The President's FY2027 request for is $46,508,000, which is $4,972,000 below the $51,480,000 Congress enacted for FY2026. Because roughly 80% of 's budget is salaries and benefits and rent is fixed, a cut that size can only be absorbed by staffing — the one input the agency says it cannot spare right now. 's own bypass request instead asks for $52,210,000, effectively arguing that its budget should go up, not down, while its caseload is elevated. Both numbers are in the same Congressional Budget Justification; Congress, not , decides which one wins.
View data as table
| FY2026 enacted | $51,480,000 | |
|---|---|---|
| FY2027 President's Budget | $46,508,000 | −$4,972,000 vs. FY2026 |
| FY2027 MSPB's own request | $52,210,000 | Bypass request to Congress |
The proposal to cut the referee out entirely
While was arguing for more staff to hear more RIF appeals, the Office of Personnel Management proposed taking that jurisdiction away from it. A rule OPM published in the Federal Register on February 10, 2026 would transfer appeal rights for employees furloughed more than 30 days, separated, or demoted by a reduction in force from to itself — the same agency that designs and directs RIFs across the government. 's stated rationale leans on decades-old criticism that appeals are "inefficient, expensive, and time consuming," and argues 's in-house, record-based review would be faster. The public comment period closed March 12, 2026; as of this writing the rule has not been finalized. If it is, the agency ordering the layoffs would also judge whether they were legal — cutting out the one independent body was created, in 1978, specifically to be.
The takeaway
- The caseload didn't wait for the capacity. 20,335 appeals arrived in a single fiscal year — four times normal — while 's own throughput and a five-and-a-half-month quorum lapse left thousands of cases stuck in the pipe.
- Staffing was cut before the surge, and the fix on offer is partial. has lost a quarter of its FY2018 headcount; the FY2027 budget on the table restores only some of it, and less than says it needs.
- The proposed remedy is to remove the referee, not fund it. 's pending rule would move RIF appeals from an independent board to the agency that orders the RIFs.
Budget and staffing figures are drawn from 's FY2027 Congressional Budget Justification, filed in April 2026; caseload and processing figures are drawn from 's FY2025 Annual Performance Report, filed the same month. Both cover different but overlapping windows, noted in each figure's table.
Sources
- , Annual Performance Report for 2025 (issued April 3, 2026) — appeals received, cases processed, quorum timeline, cases pending at headquarters, 120-day resolution rate, and Federal Circuit affirmance rate. mspb.gov
- , Congressional Budget Justification 2027 (April 2026) — counts for FY2018 and current, FY2027 staffing request, FY2026 enacted budget, FY2027 President's Budget request, and 's own bypass budget request. mspb.gov
- U.S. Office of Personnel Management, proposed rule on Reduction in Force Appeals, Federal Register (published Feb. 10, 2026) — the proposal to transfer RIF appeal jurisdiction from to , and 's stated rationale. federalregister.gov
Comments
Always open. Logged-in readers can annotate paragraphs in place.
Every federal employee who is fired, demoted, or laid off has one statutory place to appeal it: the Merit Systems Protection Board. is small by design — a bench for individual disputes, not a mass docket. Then, on February 9, 2025, the government began firing probationary employees and running reductions in force across dozens of agencies, and 's docket stopped behaving like a small agency's docket. The board that is supposed to check whether those firings followed the law is now the clearest evidence of what happens when a check gets defunded at the exact moment it's needed most.