The weather service didn't lose its budget. It lost its people.
Summary
Congress left the $589.5 million account that pays National Weather Service forecasters untouched for FY2026. But 13% of the agency's workforce left anyway in early 2025 — and the FAA's own aviation-safety staffing requirement quietly got cut rather than met.
Follow the dollar
The National Weather Service asked Congress for $1,447,927,000 for FY2026 — 32% of 's entire $4.5 billion discretionary budget, per the NOAA FY2026 Congressional Justification. The single largest slice, $589.5 million, funds "Analyze, Forecast and Support" — the budget category that pays the meteorologists staffing the 122 local Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) that issue warnings. That number is flat against FY2024 enacted levels, penny for penny. Nobody zeroed out the forecasters' budget.
View data as table
| Analyze, Forecast and Support | $589.5M | 41% — forecaster & field office salaries |
|---|---|---|
| Observations | $251.5M | 17% — radar, satellites, weather balloons |
| Science and Technology Integration | $230.7M | 16% — models & tech |
| Central Processing | $130.1M | 9% — national forecast centers |
| Dissemination | $117.0M | 8% — distributing forecasts & warnings |
| Procurement, Acquisition & Construction | $129.2M | 9% — equipment & facilities |
The same system, counted in people
The money survived. The staff didn't. The Commerce Department's Inspector General put a hard number on it in its most recent oversight report: NWS "faces long-standing workforce challenges, exacerbated by the departure of approximately 13 percent of its employees in early 2025." The Senate Commerce Committee put a raw count on the same event: more than 560 NWS employees lost to the year's deferred-resignation program and firings. 's response, announced June 2, 2025, was hiring-freeze exemptions covering 126 positions — meteorologists, hydrologists, physical scientists, and electronics technicians — under a quarter of what left.
View data as table
| Employees lost | 560+ | early 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Rehires approved | 126 | announced June 2, 2025 — under 1/4 of the loss |
Understaffed field offices show up in the record in blunt, procedural ways. On February 27, 2025 — the day the cuts began — NWS Headquarters notified its partners that it was suspending weather balloon launches at Kotzebue, Alaska, indefinitely, "due to a lack of WFO staffing." Similar suspensions followed at stations across the northern Plains and Mountain West that spring — thinning out the 100-station radiosonde network that feeds the forecast models the $230.7 million "Science and Technology Integration" line pays to run.
The clearest, most consequential version of the same gap sits inside aviation safety. A 2016 interagency agreement requires the Weather Service to staff 90 full-time-equivalent meteorologist positions across the 21 Center Weather Service Units that brief air traffic controllers on hazardous weather nationwide. Rather than fill the gap, FAA and NWS agreed to lower the FY2025 target to 81 FTEs. By June 2025, actual staffing had fallen further still, to 69 — 23% below the original requirement, with five of the 21 units down to one or two meteorologists apiece. The Government Accountability Office called it an urgent safety risk in its August 2025 report.
View data as table
| Required (2016 agreement) | 90 | FTE meteorologist positions |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 cap (amended) | 81 | lowered rather than met |
| Actual, June 2025 | 69 | 23% below the original requirement |
The takeaway
- The money didn't disappear. The $589.5 million forecaster line and the agency's overall $1.45 billion FY2026 request are both intact and essentially flat — this was never a budget-cutting story.
- The people did. The Commerce Department's own inspector general puts the early-2025 workforce loss at 13%; the Senate Commerce Committee's count is upwards of 560 employees, against 126 approved rehires.
- When a target couldn't be met, it got redefined instead. The -NWS aviation weather agreement didn't get funded up to its 90-position requirement — the requirement got cut to 81, and actual staffing still fell short of that, to 69.
Budget figures are the FY2026 request as submitted to Congress in June 2025, not final enacted appropriations, which Congress had not completed as of publication. Staffing figures span several 2025 vintages, each noted against its source.
Sources
- , 2026 Budget Estimates to Congress (Congressional Justification), Department of Commerce Exhibit 4B Control Table — NWS budget by subactivity and 's agency-wide total request. noaa.gov
- U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Inspector General, Top Management and Performance Challenges Facing the Department of Commerce in Fiscal Year 2026 (-26-003, Dec. 1, 2025) — the 13% NWS workforce departure figure. oig.doc.gov
- U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation (Ranking Member Maria Cantwell), "National Weather Service Partial Rehire Plan Isn't Good Enough" (June 2, 2025) — the 560-employees-lost and 126-rehires-approved figures. commerce.senate.gov
- U.S. Government Accountability Office, Aviation Meteorologists: Urgent Actions Needed to Address Staffing Concerns (-25-108597, Aug. 28, 2025) — the 90/81/69 aviation meteorologist staffing figures. gao.gov
- National Weather Service Headquarters, Public Information Statement 25-08 (Feb. 27, 2025) — the Kotzebue, AK weather balloon launch suspension "due to a lack of WFO staffing." weather.gov
Comments
Always open. Logged-in readers can annotate paragraphs in place.
Every flood, tornado, and hurricane warning in the United States traces back to the same line item: the account that pays National Weather Service meteorologists to sit in front of radar screens. That line item is intact. Congress is not proposing to cut it. The people it was supposed to fund left anyway.