BlackLeafwatch the watchmen
North Carolina's landfill cleanup oversight (DEQ Pre-Regulatory Landfill Program)

North Carolina's Landfill Cleanup Backlog Would Take 99 Years

Summary

A state audit found North Carolina has identified 688 landfills that operated before 1983 environmental rules -- 84% within 1,000 feet of a home, school, or drinking well -- but 534 of them have never been investigated for contamination. At the roughly $10.3 million a year the state has to spend on the work after administrative costs, clearing that backlog would take about 99 years; where investigators have looked, nearly a quarter of sites found explosive-range methane, and the audit's three case studies -- a Fayetteville landfill with methane readings 12 times the explosive limit, plus two parks closed to children in Durham and Charlotte -- show what's at stake.

By Vindex · July 15, 2026

North Carolina's Office of the State Auditor -- the state's independent, elected fiscal watchdog -- found that the Department of Environmental Quality's program for finding and cleaning up landfills that predate the state's 1983 waste rules is moving so slowly it would take about 99 years to finish the job. Of 688 identified pre-regulation sites, 84% sit within 1,000 feet of a home, school, daycare, church, or drinking well, and 534 of them -- 78% -- have never been investigated for contamination at all.

A tax built for this job still isn't enough

The Pre-Regulatory Landfill Program, created in 2007, is funded by a piece of nearly every dump run in the state: a $2-per-ton tax on solid waste disposal, half of which flows into North Carolina's Inactive Hazardous Sites Cleanup Fund. That fund has taken in an average of $12.1 million a year since 2019. After the roughly 15.5% of receipts state law allows the Program to spend on administration, about $10.3 million a year is left for actual site work -- against an average cost per site of $1.9 million. At that funding level, the state can finish only five or six sites a year.

Sites never investigated
534 of 688
78% of North Carolina's known pre-1983 landfill sites hadn't been examined for contamination as of June 30, 2025
Time to clear the backlog at current funding
~99 years
At about $10.3 million a year available for site work, DEQ can complete only 5-6 site remediations annually
Sites within 1,000 feet of homes, schools, or wells
84%
Most of the 688 identified sites sit close enough that undetected contamination could reach nearby residents, students, or drinking water
Most sites are still waiting to be looked at
North Carolina's 688 pre-regulatory landfill sites, by Program status as of June 30, 2025
Awaiting investigation
534
In active investigation
75
Reached No Further Action
37
Source: NC Office of the State Auditor, PER-2026-4300, Background/Exhibit 1
View data as table
Of 688 identified sites, 534 have never been investigated, 75 are in active investigation (18 stalled by a lack of property-owner access), and 37 have reached No Further Action status since the Program's 2007 creation. The remaining roughly 42 sites (688 minus the three categories shown) are in the remediation phase.
Awaiting investigation534
In active investigation75
Reached No Further Action37

What's on the books isn't what's in hand

The math is worse in practice than on paper. As of June 30, 2025, the fund's $22.1 million balance included $16.3 million already committed to contractors' approved but unpaid task orders, leaving just $5.8 million in cash the Program could actually spend on new work. Rising contractor rates are eating into that further: hourly rates for investigation and remediation design rose 29% to 63% over the past decade, and rates for remediation oversight rose 54% to 96% -- meaning the money that bought 100 hours of design work a decade ago now buys only about 70.

Money in the fund isn't money in hand
Inactive Hazardous Sites Cleanup Fund balance, as of June 30, 2025
Fund balance
22,111,817
Committed to unpaid task orders
16,305,695
Available cash
5,806,122
Source: NC Office of the State Auditor, PER-2026-4300, Exhibit 3
View data as table
As of June 30, 2025, the Program's $22.1 million fund balance included $16.3 million already committed to approved but unpaid contractor task orders, leaving $5.8 million in available cash -- against a $1.9 million average cost per site.
Fund balance22,111,817
Committed to unpaid task orders16,305,695
Available cash5,806,122

What the uninvestigated sites might hold

Where the Program has actually looked, it has found real hazards. Of 97 sites that reached the investigation stage, 23 -- nearly a quarter -- had methane concentrations above the 5% threshold at which the gas can ignite. That rate is drawn from the sites the Program chose to investigate first by risk, not a random sample, so it isn't a statistical estimate for the 534 sites nobody has checked -- but three case studies in the audit show what waiting to look can mean. At Cliffdale Landfill in Fayetteville, a resident's 2023 report of a possible gas leak led investigators to methane readings as high as 62.7% -- more than 12 times the ignition threshold -- with 24 of 26 tested neighboring properties showing methane above that limit.

In Durham, it was a graduate student's own soil testing in December 2022, not the Program, that found lead above federal limits at five city parks; all five stayed closed through the summers of 2024 and 2025, and capping the contaminated soil is now estimated to cost $10.5 million -- more than three times the roughly $3.1 million the city spent building the parks in the first place. In Charlotte, testing ahead of a Mecklenburg County redevelopment project found lead exceeding safety thresholds in 14 of 64 soil samples at Southside Park, which the county closed to visitors -- including children on its playground -- in February 2025.

The other bottleneck: who owns the dirt

Funding isn't the only obstacle. About 78% of the identified sites sit on private land, and the Program generally can't investigate without the owner's consent -- eighteen of the 75 sites currently in active investigation are stalled for exactly that reason. The state's own top-ranked risk, the East Wake County Landfill, illustrates the trap: its owners can't clear the debris blocking investigation because doing so would mean evicting the tenants whose rent they depend on.

What DEQ has agreed to do, and by when

DEQ's Division of Waste Management agreed with every finding and recommendation in the audit. Some fixes -- reassessing which sites get prioritized, pursuing outside funding, drafting internal access policies -- are administrative and are supposed to start immediately. Others need lawmakers: the audit calls on DEQ to work with the General Assembly on a lower-threshold legal pathway to access high-risk private sites, due within six months of the report's July 2026 release. "The bottom line," State Auditor Dave Boliek said, "is there are hundreds of potentially hazardous landfill sites across North Carolina, and despite tax dollars supporting a program meant to investigate these sites, 78% haven't been examined."

The takeaway

  • A tax dedicated to exactly this job still isn't enough. The Inactive Hazardous Sites Cleanup Fund draws roughly $12 million a year from a statewide $2-per-ton waste tax, but after administrative costs, only about $10.3 million a year is available for new site work. Even that overstates what's on hand day to day: as of June 2025, $16.3 million of the fund's $22.1 million balance was already committed to unpaid contractor task orders, leaving just $5.8 million in available cash -- against a $1.9 million average cost per site.
  • The uninvestigated sites aren't just a paperwork backlog -- they're an information gap with a health dimension. Nearly a quarter of the sites the Program has actually checked had explosive-range methane; three sites the state caught by accident or outside testing closed a Charlotte park to children and kept five Durham parks shut for two straight summers.
  • DEQ agreed to fix it, on a clock. The department concurred with both of the audit's recommendations, is supposed to start reprioritizing sites and chasing outside funding immediately, and owes the General Assembly a legislative access proposal by January 2027 -- six months after the report's release.

The 23.7% methane-exceedance rate applies only to the 97 sites that have reached the investigation stage or beyond -- a group the Program selected by risk ranking, not a random sample -- so it should not be read as an estimate of conditions across the 534 uninvestigated sites. The roughly $1 billion total-remediation figure is the audit's own extrapolation of one average per-site cost ($1.9 million) across all 534 unmonitored sites; actual costs will vary site to site, and the audit's 99-year timeline estimate explicitly does not account for future contractor-cost increases, funding changes, or sites that turn out not to need full remediation. DEQ's formal written response is bound into the source PDF as scanned pages that could not be machine-extracted; this piece relies on the auditor's own summary, stated in the transmittal letter and executive summary, that DEQ's Division of Waste Management agreed with all findings and recommendations.

Sources(2) ▾
  • North Carolina Office of the State Auditor, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality — Pre-Regulatory Landfill Program (Performance Audit Report PER-2026-4300) (2026-07-13)The State Auditor's performance audit of DEQ's Division of Waste Management, Pre-Regulatory Landfill Program -- audit scope July 2019-June 2025, with program history back to its 2007 creation. Includes DEQ's written concurrence. Fetched directly and converted with pdftotext -layout. files.nc.gov · original document
  • North Carolina Office of the State Auditor, Hundreds of Former Landfill Sites Uninvestigated by DEQ Program (2026-07-13)The Auditor's public release accompanying the report, including State Auditor Dave Boliek's on-record characterization of the findings. auditor.nc.gov · original document
Weekly digest: the most-read systems, in brief. Mondays.

Comments

Always open. Logged-in readers can annotate paragraphs in place.

Loading comments…
or log in to comment under your account