Nebraska Tax Breaks Keep Paying After the Jobs Are Gone
Summary
Nebraska's Auditor of Public Accounts found that companies participating in the state's Nebraska Advantage Act tax-incentive program kept collecting refunds after eliminating the jobs the program exists to protect -- one after an acquirer closed its Nebraska project, another after the company went bankrupt. The Department of Revenue's own economic model projects the Act's cumulative cost to the state's General Fund will grow from a $1.2 billion projected loss as of FY2025 to $2.4 billion by 2034. Local governments have already lost $180.7 million in redirected sales taxes since the program began, including one town that has had 100% of its local sales tax abated since 2023. Auditors also found that 85% of tested companies had never had the follow-up audit that would confirm they kept the jobs and investment they were paid for.
Money keeps moving after the jobs leave
State law declares the Act's purpose⧉ is to encourage new businesses to relocate to Nebraska, retain existing businesses, promote the creation and retention of quality jobs, and keep investment capital in the state. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-5728 lets a company's earned tax credits transfer to whoever acquires its qualifying project -- but the statute never asks whether the acquirer keeps the project running. In one case the Auditor documented, the acquiring company closed the Nebraska project location and eliminated its jobs on acquisition, then requested and received the Act's refunds regardless.
In another case, the participating company declared bankruptcy years ago⧉ and shut its qualifying projects down over time; the State has continued paying refunds to the bankruptcy estate. "Businesses will take the money and run," Auditor Mike Foley said⧉, "while the taxpayers are left holding the bag."
View data as table
| FY2019 & Prior | 46,544,297 | Cumulative local refunds from the Act's 2006 inception through FY2019 |
|---|---|---|
| FY2020 | 18,929,776 | |
| FY2021 | 8,573,143 | |
| FY2022 | 11,040,868 | |
| FY2023 | 54,380,041 | The State began deducting nearly $65M in refunds from one municipality's monthly distribution starting Oct. 2023 -- a case still running today |
| FY2024 | 23,249,574 | |
| FY2025 | 17,973,807 |
One town has lost all its sales tax since 2023
The Act refunds both state and local sales taxes, and when a local refund is owed, the Department of Revenue simply deducts it from the money it would otherwise send the municipality that levied the tax the following year -- the city or town has no vote in the matter. One Nebraska municipality has had 100% of its local sales taxes abated since fiscal year 2023⧉, the year the State began deducting nearly $65 million in refunds tied to one company from its monthly distribution -- and the Auditor expects the impact to continue indefinitely, since the company keeps paying (and reclaiming) sales taxes under the same project. Statewide, $180,691,506 in local sales and use taxes have been redirected to participating companies since the Act began, with no dollar limit and, per the Auditor, no statutory mechanism letting a city plan for the hit before it lands.
The state's own math says it's a bad trade
Participating companies self-report 33,211 new jobs and $25.2 billion in capital investment created since the Act's 2006 inception -- but that data mostly goes unchecked. A maintenance audit is the Department's only tool, besides the initial approval, to independently verify a company still employs the people and holds the investment it was paid for; the Auditor found 17 of 20 companies tested⧉ -- 85% -- had never had one. Some of those unaudited companies also waited over four years just to have their initial qualification confirmed.
Even taking the Department's own optimistic projections at face value, the math doesn't close: the Department's own model⧉ shows the credits and refunds paid out consistently outpacing the new economic activity they're meant to generate, a gap that compounds to a projected $2.4 billion net loss by 2034 -- against a backdrop where the Legislature entered its current session facing a $451 million budget deficit. Asked to support limiting refunds once a company stops operating its project, the Department's response was that doing so "would require a legislative change" -- leaving the fix, for now, with lawmakers rather than regulators.
- Companies that eliminate the jobs their tax credits were meant to protect keep getting paid. The Auditor documented one acquirer that closed a Nebraska project and cut its jobs, then collected refunds anyway, and one bankrupt company whose refunds still flow to its bankruptcy estate.
- Local governments bear costs they can't see coming or control. $180.7 million in local sales taxes have been redirected to companies since 2006, including nearly $65 million that has cost one Nebraska municipality 100% of its local sales tax since fiscal year 2023, with no end date.
- The state's own numbers say the trade is getting worse, not better. The Department of Revenue's own model projects the Nebraska Advantage Act's net cost to the General Fund will nearly double, from a $1.2 billion projected loss as of FY2025 to $2.4 billion by 2034 -- while 85% of tested companies have never had the audit that would confirm they kept the jobs and investment they were paid to create.
This piece covers the Nebraska Advantage Act, the state's largest incentive program (closed to new applicants since 2020, still paying out through at least 2051). Its successor, the ImagiNE Nebraska Act, is separately projected to cost roughly $421 million over the same four years -- not included in the $2.4 billion FY2034 figure, which is the Advantage Act's own Department-published projection. The Department of Revenue disputed some of the Auditor's statutory interpretations but not the dollar figures reported here. The $451 million deficit figure is cited only as scale, not causation -- the two numbers are from different funds and periods. Company-level dollar amounts stay undisclosed under Nebraska's tax-confidentiality statutes; this piece reports only what the Auditor made public without naming the businesses.
Sources(3) ▾
- Nebraska Auditor of Public Accounts (State Auditor Mike Foley), Revenue ACFR Management Letter for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025 (Nebraska Auditor of Public Accounts, December 17, 2025) (2025-12-17) — The Auditor of Public Accounts' formal management letter to the Nebraska Department of Revenue following the FY2025 statewide financial audit -- the primary source for this piece's FY2025 abatement totals, the 16-of-21 (and separately, 17-of-20) maintenance-audit failure findings, the local sales-tax-refund table by fiscal year, the single-municipality case, the two named 'uninvesting' company cases (Company #5, Company #19), the late-payment and untimely-audit findings, and the catered-meal refund examples. auditors.nebraska.gov · original document
- Nebraska Auditor of Public Accounts (State Auditor Mike Foley), Tax Incentives Letter to Senators (Nebraska Auditor of Public Accounts, April 14, 2025) (2025-04-14) — A letter the Auditor sent to every member of the Nebraska Legislature, drawing on the Department of Revenue's own 'Nebraska Tax Incentives 2024 Annual Report' and the APA's prior management letter. Primary source for this piece's cumulative credits-earned/used figures, the self-reported jobs-created and capital-investment totals, the Department's own fiscal-year-by-fiscal-year revenue-gain-or-loss projection through FY2034, the four-year forward-looking General Fund impact figure, and the delinquent-tax context. auditors.nebraska.gov · original document
- Nebraska Auditor of Public Accounts (State Auditor Mike Foley), "Why Are We Shelling Out Millions in Tax Incentives to Corporations No Longer in Nebraska?" (Nebraska Auditor of Public Accounts press release, February 17, 2026) (2026-02-17) — The Auditor's own public release summarizing the December 2025 management letter's tax-incentive findings, used here solely for Foley's on-the-record quotes characterizing the findings -- every dollar figure it repeats is sourced instead to the underlying management letter above. auditors.nebraska.gov · original document
Comments
Always open. Logged-in readers can annotate paragraphs in place.
The Nebraska Advantage Act is supposed to trade tax breaks for jobs and investment -- but nothing in the program checks whether the jobs and investment are still there once the state starts paying. Nebraska's Auditor of Public Accounts⧉, the state's independently elected financial watchdog, found in a December 2025 management letter that companies have kept collecting incentive refunds after eliminating the very jobs the Act exists to protect: one company's Nebraska project was closed and its jobs cut by the business that acquired it, which then requested and received the refunds anyway; another's refunds now flow to a bankruptcy estate years after the company folded. Meanwhile, the Department of Revenue's own economic model⧉ projects the Act's net cost to the state's General Fund will grow from a $1.2 billion projected loss as of FY2025 to $2.4 billion by 2034.