BlackLeafwatch the watchmen
Packaging recycling

Oregon Collected $167.9 Million to Fund Recycling. It Spent $56.5 Million.

Summary

In the first six months of the nation's first packaging producer-responsibility law, Circular Action Alliance collected $167.9 million in producer fees, per its own 2025 Oregon annual report — and carried $111.4 million of it, 66%, into reserves. Oregon's entire waste-management and remediation workforce, 7,283 people per federal labor data, earns $536.5 million a year combined.

By Nero · July 10, 2026

On July 1, 2025, Oregon became the first state where a packaging producer-responsibility law actually took money in. Under the Recycling Modernization Act, companies that sell packaged goods into Oregon now pay dues to a state-approved nonprofit, Circular Action Alliance (CAA) Oregon, which is supposed to spend that money expanding and improving the state's recycling system. CAA's first annual report, covering the program's first six months, lays out exactly how much came in and how much went out — and the two numbers are not close.

Producer fee revenue, H2 2025
$167.9M
2,909 producers vs reported 409,510 tons of packaging
Carried into reserves
$111.4M
66% of revenue vs spent: $56.5M (34%)
Oregon's waste & recycling workforce
7,283
$536.5M/yr in wages vs BLS QCEW, 2025 annual average

How the money moved

CAA Oregon collected $167.9 million in producer fees over the report's six-month window. It spent $56.5 million — about a third of revenue — and closed the period with $111.4 million in reserves, which CAA reports splits into $60.2 million in operating reserves and $51.2 million earmarked for specific future obligations. The largest actual outlay, $19.1 million, went to eight material recovery facilities (MRFs) as processor commodity risk fees — payments meant to help those facilities weather swings in the price recyclables sell for. Another $13.0 million covered start-up costs, including $9.7 million incurred in 2022–2024 before the program even launched.

Where Oregon's first six months of producer fees went
Producer fee revenue and program spending, Jul.-Dec. 2025, in dollars
Producer fee revenue, H2 2025$167.9MProgram spending$56.5MReserves (unspent)$111.4MMRF payments (8 facilities)$19.1MStart-up costs$13MOther program costs$14.3MContamination reduction$6.3MEducation & outreach$3.8M
Source: Circular Action Alliance, CAA Oregon Annual Report 2025 (Jul. 2, 2026), Table 15, pp. 61-63
View data as table
Revenue, spending, and reserves breakdown
Program spending$56.5Mof $167.9M revenue
Reserves (unspent)$111.4Mof $167.9M revenue
— MRF payments (8 facilities)$19.1Mof program spending
— Start-up costs$13.0Mof program spending
— Other program costs$14.3Mof program spending
— Contamination reduction$6.3Mof program spending
— Education & outreach$3.8Mof program spending

CAA's own explanation for the gap is timing, not retreat: the report calls 2025 a "build year" and says planned investments — new depot sites, collection-service expansions, materials-management infrastructure — are shifting into 2026 and 2027 as contracts and procurement catch up to the money that's already been collected. Nothing in the report suggests the $111.4 million is missing or misused; it's sitting in CAA's accounts, committed to obligations that haven't been billed yet.

Where the underspend concentrated

That explanation holds up unevenly across categories. Against CAA's own program-plan budget, some lines came close to fully spent; others barely started. Local government collection-services expansion — funding meant to help cities and counties add curbside routes or drop-off sites — spent just $233,077 of a planned $12.1 million, 98% unspent. PRO materials management, budgeted at $20.7 million, spent $2.7 million. At the other end, the MRF processor-risk-fee payments and the flat $4.0 million regulatory-compliance line landed on or close to budget.

Share of FY2025 program-plan budget left unspent, by category
Planned vs. actual spending, Jul.-Dec. 2025
Local govt. collection-services expansion
98.1%
PRO materials management
87%
Transportation reimbursement
74.7%
Contamination reduction programming
68.7%
Education & outreach
61.8%
MRF payments (CRPFs)
42%
Regulatory
0%
Source: Circular Action Alliance, CAA Oregon Annual Report 2025 (Jul. 2, 2026), Table 15, p. 62
View data as table
Percent of planned budget unspent, by category
Local govt. collection-services expansion98.1%unspent
PRO materials management87.0%unspent
Transportation reimbursement74.7%unspent
Contamination reduction programming68.7%unspent
Education & outreach61.8%unspent
MRF payments (CRPFs)42.0%unspent
Regulatory0.0%unspent

The workforce this money is supposed to reach

The RMA's stated purpose is to fund the people and facilities that actually collect and process Oregon's recyclables — not to build a reserve fund. Federal labor data puts a number on that workforce: as of 2025, 496 establishments in Oregon's waste management and remediation industry (NAICS 562) — mostly private haulers and processors, plus local-government crews — employed 7,283 people, drawing a combined $536.5 million a year in wages, per the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages. The $111.4 million CAA is holding in reserve is equivalent to roughly a fifth of that entire sector's annual payroll statewide.

Oregon's waste management & remediation workforce, by ownership
Employees, NAICS 562, 2025 annual average
Private sector
6,975
Local government
308
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, Oregon, 2025
View data as table
Employment by ownership type
Private sector6,975466 establishments, $517.0M in wages
Local government30830 establishments, $19.5M in wages

CAA says the pace picks up from here: since January 2026 it has funded nearly 20,000 additional recycling carts and three more trucks in three Oregon communities, and it opened 10 more RecycleOn drop-off centers, bringing the total to 30 by June 2026, on the way to a planned 144 by the end of 2027.

The takeaway

  • Producers paid $167.9 million into Oregon's recycling system in six months. Only $56.5 million — 34% — reached the system in that window, per CAA's own annual report.
  • The underspend is concentrated in the categories meant to expand service, not maintain it. Local government collection-service expansion spent 2% of its planned budget; MRF payments, the closest thing to keeping existing infrastructure running, spent 58% of theirs.
  • The reserve isn't small next to the workforce it's meant to serve. $111.4 million is worth about a fifth of the combined annual payroll of everyone employed in Oregon's waste management and remediation industry, per .

Figures cover CAA Oregon's first reporting period (Jul. 1-Dec. 31, 2025) only; CAA describes 2025 as a deliberate "build year" with spending timelines shifting into 2026-2027. The $536.5 million wage figure is Oregon's entire NAICS 562 industry payroll, not money the RMA program itself pays out — it is offered here only as a scale comparison for the $111.4 million reserve.

Sources

  • Circular Action Alliance, CAA Oregon Annual Report 2025 (released Jul. 2, 2026) — the source for producer fee revenue ($167.9M), program expenditures ($56.5M), accumulated reserves ($111.4M), the FY2025 program-plan-vs-actual budget breakdown (Table 15), producer and tonnage counts, and CAA's own explanation for the underspend. recycleon.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/CAA-AnnualReport25-Oregon.pdf
  • Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Recycling Modernization Act program page — regulatory background on the RMA and CAA's role as the state-approved Producer Responsibility Organization. oregon.gov/deq/recycling
  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW), Oregon, NAICS 562 (Waste Management and Remediation Services), 2025 annual averages — the source for the 7,283-worker, $536.5 million statewide wage total used as a scale comparison for the reserve. data.bls.gov/cew/data/api/2025/a/industry/562.csv
Weekly digest: the most-read systems, in brief. Mondays.

Comments

Always open. Logged-in readers can annotate paragraphs in place.

Loading comments…
or log in to comment under your account