The $1.8 Billion Aluminum Fraud That Settled for $549M
Summary
A federal jury convicted Perfectus Aluminum's shell companies of spot-welding 2.2 million aluminum extrusions into fake pallets to dodge duties meant to protect U.S. manufacturers. A court ordered $1.84 billion in restitution in 2022; an appeals court vacated that order in 2024. The civil settlement the Justice Department actually finalized this May, funded entirely by selling the seized warehouses and pallets, came to $549.5 million -- 30% of what the restitution order once demanded, and less than a fifth of what prosecutors say the scheme actually cost.
How pallets nobody bought became a $3 billion allegation
Antidumping and countervailing duties are tariffs Commerce imposes specifically when a foreign producer sells into the U.S. below cost or with a government subsidy -- a tool meant to offset the price advantage, not just collect revenue. Commerce imposed such duties on aluminum extrusions from China in May 2011⧉, after the U.S. International Trade Commission found the imports were materially injuring domestic manufacturers. China Zhongwang Holdings, which the government's own court filings describe as the largest aluminum extrusion company in Asia⧉, responded by tack-welding its extrusions together so they resembled pallets -- a finished-goods form the duties weren't written to reach.
Between 2011 and 2014, Perfectus Aluminum, acting as Zhongwang's U.S. buyer, imported 2.2 million of these pallets⧉, paid for with money Zhongwang itself funneled through Hong Kong shell companies. There were no customers. Prosecutors say the pallets existed only to get the metal past customs; the plan, once they'd cleared the border, was to melt them back down.
Convicted in 2021, ordered to pay in 2022, vacated in 2024
On August 23, 2021⧉, a jury in the Central District of California convicted the Perfectus companies and four affiliated warehouse operators of conspiracy, wire fraud, and passing false documents through a customhouse. The court then ordered them, jointly and severally, to pay $1,836,244,745 in restitution⧉ to -- a debt meant to make the government whole for duties it was never paid. It didn't hold. On July 31, 2024⧉, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the convictions but vacated the restitution order and remanded the case to the district court, which -- as of the docket's last recorded filing -- had not reissued one.
View data as table
| Alleged CBP duty loss (civil complaint) | $3,000,000,000+ |
|---|---|
| Restitution ordered, 2022 (vacated 2024) | $1,836,244,745 |
| Actual settlement, May 2026 | $549,594,030 |
What the government actually got: warehouses and unsold metal
With the criminal restitution track stalled on remand, closed the case's civil side separately, resolving three qui tam whistleblower suits⧉ filed starting in 2015 -- one by former sales contact Mike Rapport, one by former warehouse-company executive Eric Shen, and one by the Aluminum Extruders Council, the trade group for domestic aluminum producers. The settlement, finalized May 12, 2026⧉, totals $549,594,030: $349,594,030 from selling the four warehouses the companies used to store the aluminum, and $200,000,000 from selling the 279,808 pallets⧉ had seized and still held. That is the entire recovery -- built from the same physical assets that, under an October 2025 side agreement⧉, had originally been earmarked to pay down the (now-vacated) restitution order instead.
View data as table
| Sale of the four warehouses | $349,594,030 |
|---|---|
| Sale of 279,808 aluminum pallets | $200,000,000 |
| TOTAL settlement amount | $549,594,030 |
The individuals named in the indictment aren't part of this deal
The settlement resolves civil claims only against the corporate shells -- Perfectus Aluminum and its warehouse affiliates -- and explicitly reserves "any liability of individuals"⧉, as well as the criminal restitution and forfeiture obligations from the underlying case. Zhongtian Liu, the Zhongwang chairman the original indictment names as directing the scheme, and the executives who ran it day to day, were never parties to this agreement. Neither was Zhongwang itself. Whatever the government still intends to collect from them -- on the vacated restitution order or otherwise -- remains an open question with no date attached.
The largest case in a fast-growing task force
The Trade Fraud Task Force⧉, the - unit that opened in August 2025 to prosecute customs fraud, announced on July 14, 2026 that it had surpassed $1 billion in recoveries and charged losses in under a year. Perfectus Aluminum's $549.5 million settlement, finalized two months earlier, accounts for roughly 55% of that total by itself -- more than every other case named in the same announcement combined. The Aluminum Extruders Council⧉, whose 170-plus U.S. member facilities across 36 states compete against the kind of underpriced imports the 2011 duty order was meant to stop, filed its own qui tam suit against Zhongwang in 2018 -- one of the three whistleblower claims that eventually forced the settlement.
- A federal court ordered $1.84 billion in restitution in 2022; the Ninth Circuit vacated that order in 2024, and the district court had not reissued one as of the case's last recorded docket filing.
- What the government actually collected, finalized in May 2026, is $549.5 million -- 29.9% of the vacated restitution figure and 18.3% of the $3 billion-plus in duties prosecutors say the scheme cost.
- The settlement money came entirely from liquidating the fraud's own physical remains -- four warehouses and 279,808 aluminum pallets that were never sold to a real customer -- not from any other assets of the companies involved.
- The individuals named in the original indictment were not part of the settlement. The agreement covers only the corporate shells; liability for the executives who ran the scheme, and for its Hong Kong-listed parent company, remains explicitly unresolved.
- This is the largest case inside a fast-growing enforcement push. 's Trade Fraud Task Force says it has recovered more than $1 billion in customs fraud since August 2025; this single settlement accounts for roughly 55% of that total.
The share-of-restitution, share-of-alleged-loss, warehouse-plus-pallet sum check, relator dollar share, duty-rate cross-check, years-since-order, and task-force-share figures are this outlet's own arithmetic performed on numbers the settlement agreement and 's press releases each separately state (methods and results in analysis.json); none of the source documents state these derived comparisons themselves. archive.org's Save Page Now returned no usable snapshot for the CourtListener docket page on this pass (a live, continuously-updated record), so no archiveUrl is recorded for that source; existing Wayback snapshots predating this pass were used for every other cited document. A blind adversarial verifier, working from the source files alone with no access to this draft or its research trail, independently checked every itemized fact; see verification.json.
Sources(7) ▾
- U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Settlement Agreement — United States, CBP, Warehouse Defendants, Perfectus Defendants, and Relators (In re Perfectus Aluminum civil FCA case) (2026-05-12) — The signed settlement agreement itself (posted by alongside its press release) — the primary source for the settlement's exact dollar figures and their breakdown, the restitution amount and dates it was ordered, the July 2024 appellate history, the qui tam filing dates and case numbers, the October 2025 warehouse-sale side agreement, the 279,808-pallet forfeiture order, the civil complaint's alleged duty-loss figure and countervailing-duty rate, and the explicit carve-outs (criminal restitution/forfeiture, individual liability) the agreement does not release. justice.gov · original document
- U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Public Affairs, Perfectus Aluminum Inc. and Related Companies Agree to Pay $549.5M to Settle False Claims Act Allegations Relating to Evaded Customs Duties (2026-05-12) — 's own announcement of the settlement — source for the 2011-2014 scheme description, the 2.2-million-extrusion import count, the August 23, 2021 conviction date and case number, official quotes, and the relator/whistleblower mechanics. justice.gov · original document
- U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Public Affairs, Trade Fraud Task Force Surpasses $1 Billion in Recoveries and Charged Losses in Less Than One Year (2026-07-14) — 's milestone announcement for the Trade Fraud Task Force, the cross-agency unit that coordinated the Perfectus case — source for the task force's August 2025 launch date, its self-reported $1 billion-plus recovery total as of July 14, 2026, and its list of other recent high-dollar customs-fraud settlements used here to size Perfectus's settlement against the task force's total. justice.gov · original document
- U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (Federal Register), Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order (2011-05-26) — The original 2011 order that created the duty obligation the Perfectus scheme evaded — source for the order's date, its basis in Commerce and ITC affirmative determinations, and the ITC's May 13, 2010 finding of material injury to the domestic industry. federalregister.gov · original document
- CourtListener / Free Law Project (from PACER), United States v. Liu, No. 2:19-cr-00282 (C.D. Cal.) — docket (2026-05-13) — The case docket for the underlying criminal case — source for the July 31, 2024 Ninth Circuit disposition ('Defendants convictions AFFIRMED. Restitution order VACATED and REMANDED') and confirmation that no new restitution order had been docketed as of the case's last recorded filing (January 8, 2025). courtlistener.com · original document
- U.S. Attorney's Office, Central District of California (filed with the court), Government's Sentencing Position and Objections to the Presentence Investigation Report (Case 2:19-cr-00282-RGK, Document 348) (2022-02-28) — The government's own sentencing filing in the underlying criminal case — used here only for color the settlement agreement doesn't cover: China Zhongwang Holdings' description as the largest aluminum extrusion company in Asia and the IPO-era origin of the fraud. courthousenews.com · original document
- Aluminum Extruders Council, Domestic Supply — Aluminum Extruders Council (2026-07-17) — The Aluminum Extruders Council's own description of the domestic industry it represents — AEC is one of the three relators (whistleblowers) whose qui tam suits led to this settlement; used here to identify who AEC is and the scale of the industry the 2011 duty order was meant to protect. aec.org · original document
Comments
Always open. Logged-in readers can annotate paragraphs in place.
A federal jury convicted six Perfectus Aluminum shell companies in 2021 of spot-welding 2.2 million aluminum extrusions⧉ into fake pallets to dodge duties on Chinese aluminum -- a scheme the Justice Department's civil complaint alleges⧉ deprived Customs and Border Protection of more than $3 billion. A court ordered the companies to pay $1.84 billion in restitution the next year. In 2024, a federal appeals court vacated that order and sent it back for reconsideration -- and it has not been reissued since. What the Justice Department actually collected, in a civil settlement finalized this May⧉ by selling off the seized warehouses and the unsold pallets themselves, is $549.5 million -- less than a third of the restitution figure and a fraction of what prosecutors say the fraud actually cost.