Rural America is running out of places to give birth
Summary
Medicaid finances 46.9% of rural births — more than in any city — but rural hospitals are closing labor and delivery wards at a rate of two a month. 139 have stopped delivering babies since 2020, and nearly 100 more are losing money right now.
The floor Medicaid built
View data as table
| Non-metro (rural) counties | 46.9% | of births financed by Medicaid, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| National | 41.2% | of births financed by Medicaid, 2023 |
| Metro counties | 40.3% | of births financed by Medicaid, 2023 |
Nationally, Medicaid financed 41.2% of all US births in 2023 — 1.48 million of them. CMS's own maternal-health data puts the figure at "about 41%" as well, drawing on 2021 birth records. The rural number runs higher because rural counties skew poorer and less likely to carry employer coverage — exactly the population Medicaid exists to reach. That's the program working as designed. What it wasn't designed to do, on its own, is keep a 24-hour labor-and-delivery unit staffed and solvent in a county with a few dozen births a month.
The wards are closing anyway
View data as table
| Stopped delivering babies since end of 2020 | 139 | 13% reduction in rural L&D units; CHQPR, June 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Still delivering, losing money in both of last 2 years | ~100 | financially at risk of closing next; CHQPR, June 2026 |
Since the end of 2020, 139 rural hospitals have stopped delivering babies or announced they will before the end of 2026 — a 13% cut to the country's rural labor-and-delivery map, averaging more than two closures a month for five straight years. Less than half of US rural hospitals — 41% — still offer labor and delivery at all; in twelve states, fewer than one in three do. And the pipeline isn't drying up: using 2024–2025 hospital cost reports, the Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform finds nearly 100 rural hospitals still delivering babies lost money on all patient services in both of the two most recent years — the same balance-sheet signature that preceded the closures already on the books. CHQPR's own analysis is blunt about the cause: the problem isn't only that Medicaid pays too little. Rural birth volumes are too small to spread the fixed cost of round-the-clock staffing, and private insurers, including Medicare Advantage plans, are the largest single source of the resulting losses — Medicaid's higher share of the patient mix just means public policy owns a bigger piece of the fallout when the payment math fails.
What's left on the map
View data as table
| Rural counties | 67.4% | with no hospital offering obstetric care, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| All U.S. counties | 52% | with no hospital offering obstetric care, 2022 |
The closures land on a map that was already thin. As of 2022, 52% of all US counties had no hospital offering obstetric care; among rural counties the share without one was 67.4%. March of Dimes counted 35% of US counties as full "maternity care deserts" — no hospital, birth center, or obstetric clinician at all — home to 2.3 million women of reproductive age, with 150,000 babies born to people living in them that year alone. Separately, at least 107 obstetric units closed nationwide in 2021 and 2022, roughly 1 in every 25 in the country. The CHQPR count of 139 rural closures since 2020 and the March of Dimes count of 107 national closures in 2021–2022 use different hospital samples and windows, but they describe the same direction: fewer places to give birth, concentrated in the places that rely on Medicaid the most.
The takeaway
- Medicaid carries the load, not the leverage. It finances more rural births than any private plan, but its payment rates are only one of the inputs — private insurers, low delivery volumes, and fixed 24/7 staffing costs all push the same direction.
- The closures are not slowing down. 139 rural hospitals have stopped delivering babies since 2020, and roughly 100 more are running the same financial deficit that preceded past closures.
- Access was already thin before the latest closures. Two-thirds of rural counties had no hospital offering obstetric care in 2022 — the baseline these new closures are subtracting from, not adding to.
Figures span different years and hospital samples — / vital statistics (2023), CHQPR hospital cost-report analysis (2024–2025 and cumulative since 2020), and March of Dimes county-level access data (2022) — because no single tracker covers Medicaid financing, hospital finances, and county-level access on the same calendar; each number is dated where it appears.
Sources
- , Births Financed by Medicaid — state and national Medicaid share of births, 2016–2023, including the metro/non-metro split, analysis of NCHS National Vital Statistics System natality data via WONDER. kff.org
- , 2024 Medicaid & Beneficiaries at a Glance: Maternal Health — corroborating national Medicaid birth-financing share ("about 41%"), 2021 data, released May 2024. medicaid.gov
- Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform, Stopping the Loss of Rural Maternity Care (June 2026) — count of rural labor-and-delivery closures since 2020, share of rural hospitals still offering the service, and the financial-risk analysis of hospitals still delivering babies. chqpr.org
- March of Dimes, Nowhere to Go: Maternity Care Deserts Across the US (Report No. 4, 2024) — county-level obstetric hospital access, maternity care desert counts, and 2021–2022 national obstetric unit closures, analysis of American Hospital Association data. marchofdimes.org
Comments
Always open. Logged-in readers can annotate paragraphs in place.
Medicaid is the single largest payer of childbirth in rural America. In non-metropolitan counties it financed 46.9% of births in 2023, compared with 40.3% in metro counties — public insurance carrying more of rural obstetrics than any private plan. That should make Medicaid's payment rates the thing that decides whether a rural maternity ward survives. It increasingly is — and the wards are losing.