BlackLeafwatch the watchmen
Tariffs

Illegal tariffs came in by algorithm. They're going out by hand.

Summary

The Supreme Court struck down the IEEPA tariffs in February 2026. Customs and Border Protection had already collected $166 billion under them — and by late May had certified refunds on just $20.6 billion of it, because undoing 53 million entries takes, by the agency's own sworn estimate, 4.4 million work-hours.

By Locusta · July 9, 2026

Collecting a tariff takes an importer's declaration and a line of code. Giving one back, it turns out, takes a person. On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court ruled 6–3 in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act never gave the president the power to impose tariffs at all — voiding the "reciprocal," fentanyl, and Canada/Mexico duties collected since April 2025. U.S. Customs and Border Protection had, by then, already collected the money. Getting it back out has become its own bureaucracy.

IEEPA duties collected
$166B
ruled unconstitutional, Feb. 2026
Certified for refund
$20.6B
12% of collections, as of May 22
Work-hours to unwind it by hand
4.4M
CBP's own sworn estimate

Follow the dollar backward

Every dollar of IEEPA duty was collected the same way the rest of the tariff system runs: an importer files an entry, a rate applies automatically, the money moves. Reversing that requires to individually re-touch each entry — a process the agency's own courtroom filings show is, three months after the ruling, barely a fifth done.

Where the illegal tariff dollar went — and where it's stuck
IEEPA duty collections and the CAPE refund pipeline, $ billions, as of May 22, 2026
IEEPA duties collected$166BAccepted into CAPE refund pipeline$85BNot yet in the refund pipeline$81BCertified & sent to Treasury$20.6BAccepted, still under CBP review$64.4B
Source: Declarations of Brandon Lord, CBP Executive Director of Trade Programs, filed with the U.S. Court of International Trade, March 6 and May 26, 2026
View data as table
IEEPA collections and refund pipeline status
IEEPA duties collected$166Bas of Mar. 4, 2026
Accepted into CAPE refund pipeline$85Bas of May 22, 2026
Not yet in the refund pipeline$81Bas of May 22, 2026
Certified & sent to Treasury$20.6Bof the $85B accepted
Accepted, still under CBP review$64.4Bof the $85B accepted

Of the $166 billion in IEEPA duties says it had collected as of March 4, 2026 — per a sworn declaration filed with the Court of International Trade — only about half, $85 billion, had even entered 's new refund system by May 22. Of that $85 billion, had actually certified and sent to the Treasury for disbursement just $20.6 billion — 12 cents of every dollar collected, according to a follow-up declaration filed in a second case at the same court. The rest — $145.4 billion — sits somewhere between "not yet processed" and "under review," three months after the tariffs that raised it were ruled illegal.

The same system, counted in entries

didn't build one refund switch; it built 53 million of them. Every import shipment that paid an IEEPA duty is a separate "entry," and — with narrow exceptions — each one has to be individually reopened, recalculated, and certified before a dollar moves.

53 million entries, reprocessed one at a time
Entries carrying IEEPA duties and refund-pipeline progress, count
Entries carrying IEEPA duties
53,173,939
Covered by an accepted CAPE declaration
15,852,806
Actually liquidated without IEEPA duties
8,515,477
Source: Declaration of Brandon Lord, U.S. Court of International Trade, March 6 and May 26, 2026
View data as table
Entry-level refund progress
Entries carrying IEEPA duties53,173,939CBP declaration, Mar. 6, 2026
Covered by an accepted CAPE declaration15,852,806CBP declaration, May 26, 2026
Actually liquidated without IEEPA duties8,515,477CBP declaration, May 26, 2026

's own math, laid out in its March 6 declaration, is blunt: clearing an IEEPA duty off a single entry — reviewing it, recalculating it, liquidating it, certifying the refund — takes an Import or Entry Specialist about five minutes. Multiplied across 53,173,939 affected entries, that's 4,431,161 work-hours if done by hand — over 2,100 employee-years of labor squeezed into a court-ordered deadline, using staff says it can't fully divert without abandoning other enforcement work. built an automated shortcut, CAPE, to avoid exactly that; by May 22, ten weeks after CAPE's first phase went live, it had processed refund certifications on 8,515,477 of the 53 million entries — 16%. Of the 330,566 importers who paid IEEPA duties, said in March that only 21,423 had even completed the electronic paperwork required to receive a refund at all.

The pain isn't spread evenly. A March 2026 Center for American Progress analysis found small-business importers paid $306,000 more in tariffs, on average, in the year the IEEPA duties were in effect than the year before — money that, for many of them, is now tied up in the same 88%-unprocessed queue as everyone else's, while larger importers with in-house trade compliance teams file CAPE declarations faster and wait less.

The takeaway

  • Collection is instant; unwinding it is not. The tariffs moved money in real time through an automated system. Refunding that money requires staff to individually re-touch tens of millions of records — the government built a one-way machine.
  • Three months in, the refund is a rounding error. $20.6 billion certified against $166 billion collected is 12 cents on the dollar, and 's own filings say the bulk of the remaining work still lies ahead.
  • The queue doesn't sort by need. requires importers to actively enroll for electronic refunds before a check can move — a paperwork step that favors importers with compliance staff, not the small businesses the CAP analysis found paid the most, proportionally, to begin with.

Dollar and entry figures are drawn from sworn declarations filed in two separate Court of International Trade cases and reflect conditions on the dates stated in each filing (March 4–6 and May 22–26, 2026); the refund pipeline has continued to move since. Figures do not include Section 232 or Section 301 tariffs, which the Supreme Court's ruling did not affect.

Sources

  • U.S. Court of International Trade — Declaration of Brandon Lord ( Executive Director, Trade Programs Directorate), Atmus Filtration, Inc. v. United States, Case No. 1:26-cv-01259-RKE, ECF No. 31, filed March 6, 2026 — source for total IEEPA duties collected ($166B), total importers (330,566) and entries (53,173,939), electronic refund enrollment (21,423), and the 4,431,161 work-hour manual-processing estimate. foxrothschild.gjassets.com
  • U.S. Court of International Trade — Declaration of Brandon Lord, Euro-Notions Florida, Inc. v. United States, Case No. 1:25-cv-00595-RKE, ECF No. 30, filed May 26, 2026 — source for CAPE refund-pipeline status as of May 22, 2026: declarations submitted and accepted, entries processed, and dollar amounts accepted ($85B), certified ($20.6B), and disbursed. diaztradelaw.com
  • Supreme Court of the United States — Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, 607 U.S. ___ (2026), decided February 20, 2026 — the 6–3 ruling holding IEEPA does not authorize presidential tariffs, which triggered the refund process. supremecourt.gov
  • U.S. Customs and Border Protection — International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) Duty Refunds, agency guidance page describing the CAPE Declaration process, phases, and timelines. cbp.gov
  • Center for American Progress — In the First Year, President Trump's Tariffs Have Cost Small-Business Importers $306,000 on Average (March 2026) — source for the small-business tariff-cost figure. americanprogress.org
Weekly digest: the most-read systems, in brief. Mondays.

Comments

Always open. Logged-in readers can annotate paragraphs in place.

Loading comments…
or log in to comment under your account