FRA's Two-Person Crew Rule Costs the Rail Industry $6.6 Million Over a Decade
Summary
FRA's own regulatory impact analysis puts the ten-year, industry-wide cost of its 2024 train crew size rule at $6,636,876 — because the rule mostly writes into federal law what 79,910 locomotive engineers and conductors, per BLS, already do. It reaches only the 73 one-person crew operations FRA counted nationwide before the rule took effect.
Where the $6.6 million goes
's rulemaking didn't have to prove two-person crews are safer — the agency says plainly it "discusses the benefits but does not have sufficient data to monetize" them, because it doesn't have to change what most railroads already do. Instead the money goes to paperwork and hardware for the exceptions: locomotive alerters (devices that stop a train if a lone engineer becomes unresponsive) account for $4,427,708 of the total, two-thirds of every dollar the rule costs. The rest is process — risk assessments, special approvals, notifications, annual reports, and 's own cost of administering all of it.
View data as table
| Alerters | $4,427,708 | ≈67% of the total |
|---|---|---|
| Risk assessment & special approval | $816,222 | |
| Operating rules | $400,778 | |
| Notification | $296,247 | |
| Government administrative cost | $513,100 | |
| Annual reporting | $182,821 | |
| Total (10-year, 7% discount) | $6,636,876 |
That $6.6 million is spread across a regulated universe of 784 railroads — "excluding tourist railroads not on the general system," in 's own count — of which only a sliver run one-person crews at all. Class I railroads (the large freight carriers) mostly abandoned one-person operation years ago under pressure from labor agreements; it's the short lines that kept it, and it's short lines the rule mostly regulates.
A rule sized to a small workforce question
The other way to read the $6.6 million figure is against the workforce it touches. The occupations a "crew" is made of — locomotive engineers and conductors — employed a combined 79,910 people nationwide as of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics's May 2025 Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey: 33,470 locomotive engineers and 46,440 conductors and yardmasters. 's 73 counted one-person operations are a rounding error against that workforce — the rule's compliance cost is not being paid to add or remove jobs at any scale visible in national labor statistics; it's being paid to document an exception that already existed.
View data as table
| Locomotive engineers | 33,470 | BLS OEWS, May 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Conductors & yardmasters | 46,440 | BLS OEWS, May 2025 |
| Combined two-person crew | 79,910 | sum of the two occupations |
The two roles aren't interchangeable and aren't paid the same. Locomotive engineers, who operate the train, earn a national annual mean wage of $85,900; conductors and yardmasters, who manage the train's movement, switching, and safety checks from the ground and the cab, earn $79,100 — both per the same survey. A one-person operation eliminates one of these two positions per train; which one depends on the railroad's staffing model, and 's rule does not specify which.
View data as table
| Locomotive engineers | $85,900 | annual mean wage |
|---|---|---|
| Conductors & yardmasters | $79,100 | annual mean wage |
The rule was not written on a blank slate. 's own accident data cited in the rulemaking shows the rate of human-factor-caused accidents rose from 0.95 per million train miles in 2013 to 1.34 in 2022 — a 41.1% increase — as the agency built its safety case. Rail unions BLET and SMART-TD, which represent "the vast majority of operating train crew workers across the nation," asked to go further and "mandate that two-person crews are the standard." The Association of American Railroads opposes the rule outright, countering with 's own 2019 finding that "accident/incident data does not support a train crew staffing regulation" and arguing staffing decisions belong in collective bargaining, not federal rule. Multiple Class I railroads — including Union Pacific, BNSF, and others — sued to void the rule; the consolidated challenge is before the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, and as of this writing the rule remains in effect while that litigation continues.
The takeaway
- The rule's price tag is small because its reach is small. 's own analysis puts the ten-year, nationwide cost at $6,636,876 — two-thirds of it locomotive alerters for one-person operations that already existed at 73 sites, all on small Class III railroads.
- Most of the rule is process, not staffing change. Notification, risk assessment, special approval, and annual reporting requirements make up roughly a third of the total cost; they formalize 's visibility into one-person operations rather than eliminating them outright, since legacy Class III operations were grandfathered in.
- The workforce debate is bigger than the rule's dollar figure. 79,910 locomotive engineers and conductors work in the occupations at stake nationally, per — a scale the rule's $6.6 million compliance cost and 73-operation reach don't come close to matching, which is exactly the industry's and the unions' disagreement: whether a rule this narrow should be read as a safety floor or as base camp for a broader staffing mandate later.
The $6.6 million figure and its category breakdown are 's own figures from the rule's regulatory impact analysis, not this piece's calculation. The 73-operation count is 's own pre-rule estimate for Class III railroads specifically; it does not capture whatever new one-person operations Class I or Class II railroads may seek special approval for under the rule's process. Employment and wage figures are national means from 's May 2025 survey, the most recent available as of this writing, and are not broken out by railroad class or by which crew position a given one-person operation eliminates.
Sources
- Federal Register, Train Crew Size Safety Requirements, 89 FR 25062 (Apr. 9, 2024), Regulatory Impact Analysis — the rule's own 10-year and annualized cost estimates, cost-category breakdown, the 73-operation Class III count, the 784-railroad regulated universe, and the human-factor accident rate trend cited in the rule's safety justification. federalregister.gov
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025 — national employment and annual mean wage for locomotive engineers (SOC 53-4011) and railroad conductors & yardmasters (SOC 53-4031), pulled from 's public OEWS data API after the bls.gov landing pages returned HTTP 403 to automated fetch this session. bls.gov/oes · API: engineers · API: conductors
- Association of American Railroads, Freight Rail Crew Size policy position — industry opposition to the rule, including its quotation of 's 2019 finding that "accident/incident data does not support a train crew staffing regulation." aar.org/issue/crew-size
- Law360 Employment Authority, coverage of the consolidated railroad challenge to the crew-size rule before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit — corroborates that the litigation was ongoing and the rule remained unstayed as of the article's reporting. law360.com
Comments
Always open. Logged-in readers can annotate paragraphs in place.
On June 10, 2024, the Federal Railroad Administration's Train Crew Size Safety Requirements rule took effect — the first federal regulation to set a minimum crew size for U.S. freight trains. Rail unions had sought it for years; the rail industry sued to block it. What the rule actually changes, in dollar terms, is small. 's own regulatory impact analysis puts the ten-year, industry-wide compliance cost at $6,636,876, discounted at 7% — because, as the rule itself states, "[the] majority of trains operate with two crewmembers" already. The regulation's real content is a permission process for the exceptions: counted 73 one-person train crew operations nationwide, all at small Class III (short line) railroads, that now have to notify the agency, install alerters, and file annual reports to keep running.