BlackLeafwatch the watchmen
USDA Relocation

USDA Sends Its Research Agencies Back to the City Where It Lost Three-Quarters of Their Staff

Summary

In 2019, USDA moved two research agencies to Kansas City on a promise of $300 million in savings; three-quarters of the relocated staff quit rather than go, and an independent analysis put the real cost at $83–182 million. Its own inspector general has now found the department lost 18% of its entire workforce in five months — before this year's second Kansas City move even begins.

By Locusta · July 10, 2026

has already run this experiment once. In 2019 it moved the Economic Research Service (ERS) and the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) from Washington to Kansas City, promising $300 million in savings. Three-quarters of the staff ordered to relocate left instead, according to a Congressional Research Service report on the move. In April 2026, Government Executive reported that is sending both agencies back to Kansas City — a second attempt at the same relocation, on the same agencies, with the results of the first one already on the record.

Left rather than relocate, 2019
75%
ERS + NIFA staff ordered to Kansas City
Independent cost estimate
$83–182M
vs. USDA's claimed $300M in savings
USDA workforce lost, 5 months
18%
Jan.–June 2025, before the 2026 move

A move already tried

Secretary Sonny Perdue announced the ERS/NIFA relocation in August 2018. On June 13, 2019, the department released a cost-benefit analysis concluding that moving to Kansas City would save taxpayers $300 million over 15 years compared with staying in the Washington area. The Agricultural and Applied Economics Association reviewed that analysis and concluded had overstated the cost of remaining in Washington and failed to follow federal guidelines for a cost-benefit study; accounting for the value of research lost when experienced staff quit rather than move, it put the real cost of the relocation at $83 million to $182 million. A 2022 GAO review of the decision — Evidence-Based Policy Making: 's Decision to Relocate Research Agencies to Kansas City Was Not Fully Consistent with an Evidence-Based Approach — found the department's economic analysis "omitted critical costs and economic effects from its analysis of taxpayer savings, such as costs related to potential attrition," and concluded 's savings estimate was unreliable.

USDA's savings promise vs. the independent cost estimate
Dollars, 2019 relocation of ERS and NIFA to Kansas City
USDA's claimed 15-year savings
$300M
Independent estimate — high
$182M
Independent estimate — low
$83M
Source: CRS IF11527 (May 2020), citing USDA's 2019 CBA and the AAEA report; GAO-22-104540 (2022)
View data as table
2019 relocation, dollar estimates
USDA's claimed 15-year savings$300MUSDA's June 2019 CBA
Independent estimate — high$182MAAEA, cited by CRS
Independent estimate — low$83MAAEA, cited by CRS

The attrition wasn't a rounding error in an otherwise sound plan — it was most of the workforce. NIFA had 315 government employees when wrote its cost-benefit analysis; four months after the October 1, 2019 move, it had 105. ERS went from 329 to 106 over the same window. Grantees felt it directly: NIFA delayed capacity and competitive grant awards to land-grant universities by three to five months, and, per media reports citing internal memos cited by CRS, ERS delayed or discontinued numerous economic reports — prompting Senator Debbie Stabenow to write directly about the disruption.

NIFA and ERS staffing before and after the 2019 move
Permanent full-time employees
NIFA, 2019 CBA baseline
315
NIFA, Feb. 1 2020 (4 months after move)
105
ERS, 2019 CBA baseline
329
ERS, Feb. 1 2020 (4 months after move)
106
Source: Congressional Research Service, IF11527 (May 2020), citing FY2019–FY2021 President's Budget requests
View data as table
Staffing, 2019 relocation
NIFA, 2019 CBA baseline315CRS IF11527
NIFA, Feb. 1 2020105CRS IF11527
ERS, 2019 CBA baseline329CRS IF11527
ERS, Feb. 1 2020106CRS IF11527

The department is already thinner

Before this year's second Kansas City move even starts, has lost a fifth of its entire staff. A December 2025 Office of Inspector General report found the department went from 110,384 employees on January 11, 2025 to 90,078 by June 14, 2025 — 20,306 people, or 18%, gone in five months, most of it (15,114 employees) through the Deferred Resignation Program. Every agency lost staff, "with percentages ranging from 7% to 67%," the wrote. NIFA — the same agency that lost three-quarters of its Kansas City staff in 2019 — had already lost 35% of its current employees before the 2026 relocation was even announced. ERS had lost 29%.

Attrition by USDA agency, January 12–June 14, 2025
Percent of employees, before the 2026 relocation announcement
Office of the Secretary
67%
Rural Development
36%
NIFA
35%
National Ag. Statistics Service
34%
Economic Research Service
29%
Agricultural Research Service
23%
Forest Service
16%
USDA-wide
18%
Food Safety & Inspection Svc.
9%
Farm Service Agency (county)
7%
Source: USDA Office of Inspector General, OAI Report 25-064-01 (Dec. 17, 2025), Tables 1 and 2
View data as table
USDA staffing attrition, pay periods 1-11 of 2025
Office of the Secretary67%USDA OIG Table 2
Rural Development36%USDA OIG Table 2
NIFA35%USDA OIG Table 2
National Ag. Statistics Service34%USDA OIG Table 2
Economic Research Service29%USDA OIG Table 2
Agricultural Research Service23%USDA OIG Table 2
Forest Service16%USDA OIG Table 2
USDA-wide18%USDA OIG Table 1
Food Safety & Inspection Svc.9%USDA OIG Table 2
Farm Service Agency (county)7%USDA OIG Table 2

The rerun

's 2026 reorganization moves roughly 2,600 employees out of the Washington region into five new regional hubs — Kansas City, Raleigh, Indianapolis, Fort Collins, and Salt Lake City — according to Government Executive's April 2026 reporting. ERS and NIFA go back to Kansas City. The Food Safety and Inspection Service is sending two-thirds of its Washington headquarters staff to a new National Food Safety Center in Urbandale, Iowa, and a science center in Athens, Georgia — though its roughly 8,300 frontline meat and poultry inspectors, who make up 85% of staff, aren't part of the move. The Agricultural Research Service is shifting employees out of its Beltsville, Maryland complex to field locations nationwide, and the National Agricultural Statistics Service — the agency that produces the crop and livestock reports commodity markets price off of — is sending staff to St. Louis and other sites. is targeting completion by the end of 2026 so relocating employees' children can start the school year at a new address. Federal News Network reported in June 2026 that roughly 75% of surveyed researchers and 80% of surveyed and WIC staff told their union they would not relocate — the same signal the department had in 2019, before three-quarters of ERS and NIFA's staff left rather than move. has requested $55 million in its FY2027 budget for relocation costs and building preparation, Government Executive reported; federal employee unions have sued, arguing the reorganization functions as an unauthorized reduction in force.

The takeaway

  • has its own post-mortem on this exact move, and is running it again anyway. The department's 2019 cost-benefit analysis promised $300 million in savings from relocating ERS and NIFA to Kansas City; an independent review put the real cost at $83–182 million once lost research value was counted, and found 's own savings estimate omitted attrition costs entirely.
  • The attrition wasn't incidental — it was most of two agencies. NIFA and ERS each retained roughly a third of their pre-move staff four months after the 2019 relocation, and it took years and a less experienced workforce to recover.
  • The department is starting the second move already depleted. lost 18% of its entire staff in five months in 2025 — NIFA and ERS, the two agencies headed back to Kansas City, had already lost 35% and 29% respectively — before the current relocation plan even began.

Figures describing the 2019 relocation and the 2025 attrition period come from primary government and independent economic-analysis sources named above; figures describing the 2026 relocation still in progress — including the $55 million budget request and the researcher-survey percentages — are drawn from contemporaneous news reporting that itself cites officials, budget documents, and employee unions, disclosed here because the underlying documents were not independently locatable.

Sources

  • Congressional Research Service, Relocation of the Research Agencies: NIFA and ERS (IF11527, version 3, May 1, 2020) — the 75% departure rate, pre- and post-move staffing at NIFA and ERS, 's $300 million savings claim, the AAEA's $83–182 million independent cost estimate, and the grant-delay and report-discontinuation impacts. congress.gov
  • U.S. Government Accountability Office, Evidence-Based Policy Making: 's Decision to Relocate Research Agencies to Kansas City Was Not Fully Consistent with an Evidence-Based Approach (-22-104540, April 19, 2022) — 's finding that 's economic analysis omitted attrition-related costs. gao.gov
  • Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of Agriculture Staffing Levels (OAI Report 25-064-01, December 17, 2025) — department-wide and agency-by-agency headcount and attrition data for January–June 2025. oversight.gov
  • Government Executive, " kicks off more employee relocations, including some that spark déjà vu" (April 2026) — the scope and destinations of the 2026 reorganization, the ERS/NIFA repeat move to Kansas City, and the $55 million FY2027 relocation budget request. govexec.com
  • Federal News Network, " employees facing relocation weigh whether to stay or go" (June 2026) — union-reported survey figures on researcher and /WIC staff willingness to relocate in the current round. federalnewsnetwork.com
Weekly digest: the most-read systems, in brief. Mondays.

Comments

Always open. Logged-in readers can annotate paragraphs in place.

Loading comments…
or log in to comment under your account