BlackLeafwatch the watchmen
Patents

The patent office runs on fees alone — and a backlog five years in the making

Summary

USPTO spends $4.996 billion a year and takes $0 net from Congress; applicants fund the whole machine through fees. That same machine let its own backlog swell to 837,928 unexamined patent applications by January 2025 before turning it around — down to 776,995 by April 2026, on the strength of 800 newly hired examiners.

By Nero · July 10, 2026

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office does not run on your taxes. Every dollar it spends comes from the fees inventors and companies pay to file and prosecute applications, and by law the agency can only spend what it collects. That structure was supposed to insulate patent examination from the usual budget fights. Instead, between 2020 and early 2025, it presided over the worst backlog in the agency's modern history — and the same fee-funded machine is now the one working it down.

FY2026 fee collections
$4,996M
net appropriation: $0 vs fully fee-funded
Unexamined patent backlog
776,995
↓ from 837,928 vs Jan. 2025 peak
New patent examiners hired
800
in FY2025 alone vs 1,500 more planned, FY2026

Follow the fee

There is no general-fund check written to the USPTO. Congress sets fee schedules and grants the agency spending authority against what it takes in; the FY2026 Congressional Budget Justification estimates $4,996 million in total collections — $4,326 million from patent fees, $670 million from trademark fees — against a requested $4,680 million in program spending. The difference in each program is banked in that program's own reserve fund, not returned or redirected. Under this request, "the USPTO's 2026 net appropriation is $0."

Where the USPTO's money comes from — and where it goes
Estimated fee collections and program spending, FY2026, $ millions
USPTO Fee Collections (FY26 est.)$5BPatent Fees$4.3BTrademark Fees$670MPatent Program Spending$4.1BTrademark Program Spending$601MAdded to Operating Reserves$315M
Source: USPTO, FY2026 Congressional Budget Justification
View data as table
Fee collections and program spending, FY2026 estimate
Patent fees$4,326Mof $4,996M total collections
Trademark fees$670Mof $4,996M total collections
Patent Program spending$4,080Mof $4,326M in patent fees
Trademark Program spending$601Mof $670M in trademark fees
Added to operating reserves$315M$246M patent + $69M trademark

That fee-only design cuts both ways. It means patent examination isn't hostage to appropriations riders or shutdowns — the agency ran through the October 2025 lapse in government funding on its own reserves. But it also means the agency's capacity to examine applications is capped by how much applicants pay in, and for years that capacity fell behind demand.

The same system, counted in applications

The backlog is the ledger of that gap. Per the USPTO's FY2025 Agency Financial Report, the inventory of unexamined utility, plant, and reissue applications rose from 576,103 in 2020 to a peak of 837,928 in January 2025 — an increase of almost 262,000 applications in four years. First-action pendency, the time between filing and an examiner's first response, "ballooned by 39 percent to 20.5 months by January 2025 from 14.8 months at the end of 2020," the report states.

Unexamined patent application backlog, 2020–2026
Utility, plant & reissue (UPR) applications awaiting a first office action
2020
576,103
Jan. 2025
837,928
Sept. 2025
788,229
Apr. 2026
776,995
Source: USPTO, FY2025 Agency Financial Report; USPTO press release, Apr. 10, 2026
View data as table
Backlog at four points in time
2020576,103USPTO FY2025 Agency Financial Report
Jan. 2025837,928USPTO FY2025 Agency Financial Report
Sept. 2025788,229USPTO FY2025 Agency Financial Report
Apr. 2026776,995USPTO press release, Apr. 10, 2026

The turn came from staffing, not a change in fee law. The new leadership that took over in FY2025 cut examiners' non-examination duties by 75%, reassigned nearly 66 former examiners back into the examining corps, and hired 800 new patent examiners over the course of the year — on top of a staff the agency describes as "over 9,000 patent examiners." That effort cut the backlog by 49,699 applications (5.9%) by the close of FY2025, "the agency's first linear, year-over-year decrease in the unexamined patent application inventory in six years," per the AFR. It kept falling into 2026: by April 6, per the USPTO's own April 10, 2026 press release, the backlog stood at 776,995 — the lowest level in two years, and the first time in nearly a decade that first office actions issued within a fiscal year outnumbered new applications filed within it.

The FY2026 budget bets more of the same lever will keep working: it funds hiring 1,500 new patent examiners, offset by an estimated 655 attritions, alongside a smaller trademark-side hiring push of 75 new examining attorneys against 48 projected attritions.

The takeaway

  • It's a closed loop, not a subsidy. Every dollar the USPTO spends traces back to a fee an applicant paid; Congress's net contribution is $0. There's no taxpayer bailout to demand when the queue gets long — only more fee revenue or more examiners per dollar collected.
  • The backlog is a staffing chart wearing a budget number. Fee collections didn't swing wildly between 2020 and 2026 — examiner headcount and how much of examiners' time went to non-examination work did. The entire multi-year rise, and the partial recovery since, tracks people, not revenue.
  • "Turning the corner" is not "done." 776,995 applications is still 201,000 more than the agency carried in 2020, and first-action pendency was still running at 20.5 months as of the last figure the agency has published. The FY2026 budget's own long-term target — 4.5 months — is a 2028 goal, not a current state.

Backlog and pendency figures are reported by the USPTO on different dates (calendar-year snapshots for 2020 and January 2025, fiscal-year close for September 2025, and a specific date in April 2026); they are not perfectly contemporaneous with each other or with the FY2026 budget estimates, which are agency projections, not audited actuals.

Sources

Weekly digest: the most-read systems, in brief. Mondays.

Comments

Always open. Logged-in readers can annotate paragraphs in place.

Loading comments…
or log in to comment under your account