DOE set 500-plus regulations to expire. The docket disagreed
Summary
Executive Order 14270 told four agencies to make their energy regulations expire by default, with sunset rules in effect by September 30, 2025. FERC arrived 66 days late and narrow; NRC arrived 100 days late and narrower; each lost a piece on first contact with public comment. DOE arrived 241 days late and widest — 28 parts of the federal code, more than 500 regulations by the count of 14 state attorneys general, most of them fused to expire July 13, 2027 — and certified in the rule's own pages that it did 'not anticipate significant public comments.' Twenty-two comments later, DOE withdrew the whole rule, effective July 9, 2026, four days before it would have taken effect. As of today, the order's lead energy agency has no sunset rule at all; FERC's regulations start expiring December 5, 2026, and NRC's on January 8, 2027.
The order
Executive Order 14270⧉ (April 9, 2025) rests on a premise it states in one line: the Code of Federal Regulations "now approaches a staggering 200,000 pages," and regulations "linger in such volume that serious reexamination seldom occurs." Its remedy inverts the default. Ten agencies and subcomponents — , , FERC, , five Interior bureaus, and the Army Corps — were ordered to insert a Conditional Sunset Date into every regulation issued under listed energy statutes: existing rules expire one year after the sunset rule takes effect, new rules within five years, and no extension may ever run more than five years. Before anything expires, the agency must offer the public a chance to comment on the regulation's costs and benefits. The sunset rules themselves were to be effective "not later than September 30, 2025."
None made the date. FERC's Order No. 914⧉ became effective December 5, 2025 — 66 days past the deadline — inserting sunset provisions into specified regulations across 12 parts of its code, the ones it called outdated, seldom used, or duplicative. NRC's Sunset Rule⧉ became effective January 8, 2026 — 100 days past — and was narrower still, excluding anything tied to its safety mandate or permitting regime. 's rule, covering the widest ground of the three, published 241 days past the deadline and never took effect at all.
View data as table
| Apr. 9, 2025 | E.O. 14270 signed | sunset rules ordered at 10 agencies and subcomponents |
|---|---|---|
| Sept. 30, 2025 | E.O. deadline | sunset rules were to be effective by this date |
| Oct. 21, 2025 | FERC publishes Order No. 914 | direct final rule; 12 parts of 18 CFR; certified non-controversial |
| Dec. 3, 2025 | NRC publishes the Sunset Rule | direct final rule; outdated/seldom-used/duplicative regulations only |
| Dec. 5, 2025 | FERC rule effective | conditional sunset dates: December 5, 2026 |
| Dec. 18, 2025 | FERC partial rescission | 18 CFR 2.27 sunset removed after one significant adverse comment |
| Jan. 8, 2026 | NRC rule effective — minus one piece | aircraft-impact-assessment sunset withdrawn after adverse comments; sunset dates: January 8, 2027 |
| Apr. 8, 2026 | NRC re-adds the 50.150 sunset | by ordinary final rule after responding to 6 comments; expires April 8, 2027 |
| May 29, 2026 | DOE publishes DFR + companion NPRM | 28 parts of 10 CFR; certified non-controversial; OIRA calls it significant |
| June 26, 2026 | NRC opens RFI on 48 sunset units | public asked for cost-benefit data by July 27, 2026 |
| June 29, 2026 | DOE comment deadline | 14 state attorneys general file the demand to withdraw |
| July 9, 2026 | DOE withdraws the DFR | 'due to receipt of adverse comments' — 4 days before it took effect |
| July 13, 2026 | The DFR's would-have-been effective date | no DOE sunset rule is in effect; the companion NPRM survives |
| Dec. 5, 2026 | FERC's sunset date | first federal energy regulations begin expiring unless extended |
| Jan. 8, 2027 | NRC's sunset date | 48 regulatory units expire unless extended after the RFI |
What DOE tagged to expire
The direct final rule⧉ worked by appending one section to each of 28 parts: "Sections in this part will automatically expire July 13, 2027, unless the section expires earlier, is rescinded, or the sunset provision is extended." Twenty-one parts got that one-year fuse — among them the Office of Science's financial-assistance rules⧉ (part 605), the contractor-employee whistleblower program (part 708), civil penalties for classified-information violations (part 824), and the Yucca Mountain siting guidelines (parts 960 and 963). Seven security-related parts — the Human Reliability Program, restricted-data access, protective-force standards — were pre-extended to July 13, 2031, the Secretary having determined in the same document that created their expiration dates that an extension was already warranted.
View data as table
| 10 CFR 300 | July 13, 2027 | voluntary greenhouse-gas reporting |
|---|---|---|
| 10 CFR 602 | July 13, 2027 | epidemiology and health-studies grants |
| 10 CFR 605 | July 13, 2027 | Office of Science financial assistance program |
| 10 CFR 708 | July 13, 2027 | DOE contractor employee protection (whistleblower) program |
| 10 CFR 760, 766 | July 13, 2027 | domestic uranium program; uranium enrichment D&D fund assessments |
| 10 CFR 824 | July 13, 2027 | civil penalties for classified-information security violations |
| 10 CFR 950 | July 13, 2027 | standby support for nuclear plant delays |
| 10 CFR 960, 963 | July 13, 2027 | Yucca Mountain site screening and suitability guidelines |
| 10 CFR 1015 | July 13, 2027 | collection of claims owed the United States |
| 10 CFR 712 | July 13, 2031 | Human Reliability Program (nuclear-duty psychological screening) |
| 10 CFR 725, 1016, 1045 | July 13, 2031 | restricted-data access permits; safeguarding; nuclear classification |
| 10 CFR 860, 861, 862 | July 13, 2031 / 2027 | trespass, traffic, aircraft restrictions at DOE nuclear sites (861: 2027) |
| 10 CFR 1046 | July 13, 2031 | protective-force medical and training standards |
A new part 1061 held the machinery, and the machinery runs section by section: "an affected section will automatically expire and cease to be effective on the identified conditional sunset date" unless the Secretary signs a written determination — published in the Federal Register, good for at most five years — that extension is warranted. That is the labor the rule created for its own agency. Keeping the 500-plus tagged regulations alive would require determinations covering every one of them within twelve months. For scale: the Federal Register's own index counts 89 Energy Department final-rule documents in all of calendar 2025 — 14 of them FERC's. One determination can cover many sections, but the review behind each is the point of the exercise: the order's stated purpose is re-justification, not paperwork.
The money the rule did not count
The rule's economics section is an absence. Its Unfunded Mandates statement⧉ asserts no expenditures of $100 million or more in any year; its Paperwork Reduction Act statement asserts no new recordkeeping; its only forward-looking claim is that the sunset rule "is expected to generally result in decreased regulatory burdens" — a sentence with no number attached, in a rule whose subject is the mandatory cost-benefit re-examination of everyone else's regulations. The re-justification bill lands later, and elsewhere: 's June 26 request for information⧉ shows the mechanism running — the public is asked to "provide, to the extent possible, economic data to demonstrate the cost of complying with" 48 regulatory units that sunset January 8, 2027, in a comment window of 31 days.
The comments
It did not take a mass campaign. As of July 13, the docket shows 22 submissions on the direct final rule and 32 on its companion proposal — 54 total. The decisive one arrived on deadline day, June 29: fourteen state attorneys general, led by California, arguing that a rule expiring 500-plus regulations cannot be "routine, insignificant in nature and impact, and inconsequential" — the legal standard for skipping notice and comment — and stating their comments were "significant and adverse, such that must withdraw the DFR." Ten days later did, in a two-column withdrawal notice⧉ that offers one sentence of reasoning: adverse comments were received.
View data as table
| On the direct final rule | 22 | includes the 14-state attorneys general letter, filed on the June 29 deadline |
|---|---|---|
| On the companion proposed rule | 32 | the surviving half of the docket; DOE says its response comes here |
FERC and had already run this experiment at smaller scale, with the same certification — all three agencies used the identical sentence, that the agency "does not anticipate significant public comments on this rulemaking and considers it to be non-controversial." All three anticipated wrong. FERC rescinded⧉ one sunset provision (smart-grid standards guidance, 18 CFR 2.27) after a single significant adverse comment. NRC withdrew⧉ its sunset on the post-9/11 aircraft-impact-assessment requirement for new reactors after adverse comments, then re-imposed it in April⧉ through ordinary notice-and-comment procedure — the requirement now lapses April 8, 2027 unless extended. The difference at was not the procedure. It was the payload.
Where the documents disagree
The record contradicts itself three times. First, within the May 29 rule: section IV.B certifies non-controversy to dispense with notice and comment, while section IV.A reports that OIRA classified the action as a "significant regulatory action"⧉ under E.O. 12866 — a category for actions with major economic effects or novel legal issues. The attorneys general put it plainly: " does not reconcile" the two. Second, between the rule and its docket: the anticipation of no significant comments was refuted by the agency's own July 9 withdrawal, which cites the comments as its only ground. Third, between the withdrawal and the rule it withdraws: the withdrawal notice⧉ describes the May 29 rule as having amended 10 CFR parts 451, 452, and 455 — parts the May 29 rule's heading and amendatory instructions never touched — and the withdrawal's own List of Subjects includes two of those three phantom parts while omitting the third.
What happens next
The withdrawal is not the end of the docket. The companion proposed rule⧉ — same 28 parts, same sunset provisions, published the same day — survives, and has committed in the withdrawal to "respond to comments received by June 29, 2026, as part of any final action it takes on the parallel proposed rule." The clocks elsewhere run regardless: FERC's tagged regulations reach their conditional sunset December 5, 2026; 's 48 units reach theirs January 8, 2027, with the cost-benefit RFI closing July 27, 2026; the aircraft-impact requirement lapses April 8, 2027 unless extended. And 's re-engineering of its own rulemaking continued through the withdrawal week: on July 7 it proposed rewriting the Process Rule⧉ that governs how appliance-efficiency standards — regulations under one of the five statutes the sunset order covers — get made, with comments due August 6, 2026.
- The sunset experiment's first-year scoreboard, from the Federal Register record: of the agencies ordered to make energy regulations expire, the three with rules in the record — FERC, , — all missed the September 30, 2025 deadline; the two narrow implementations survived minus one provision each; the one broad implementation was withdrawn in full.
- The mechanism that killed 's rule was supplied by : a direct final rule dies on receipt of significant adverse comment, and chose that vehicle for 28 parts of the federal code while certifying — in the same document OIRA had labeled significant — that no significant comments were expected.
- The first federal energy regulations to expire under E.O. 14270 are now scheduled for December 5, 2026 (FERC) and January 8, 2027 (, 48 regulatory units). Whether they lapse or are extended turns on written determinations that must be published before those dates.
- retains a live path to the same sunset regime through the companion proposed rule, but any final rule must now answer the 54-comment record, including the procedural objections of 14 states (moderate confidence that this is the controlling constraint on timing, based on 's own commitment in the withdrawal).
Counts and dates come from the documents named in each sentence, read in full from the Federal Register PDFs (two via BlackLeaf's sealed Artemis captures, hashes in source.json). Part counts (28, 21, 7) are taken from the May 29 rule's heading and its amendatory instructions 1–58; the 500+ regulation count is the attorneys general's, stated twice in their June 29 letter, and is not independently re-derived here. Docket comment counts (22, 32) are Regulations.gov v4 API totals as of July 13, 2026 and can rise as late postings process. The 89 final-rule count is the Federal Register API's total for agency 'energy-department', calendar 2025, and includes FERC's 14. Day counts are calendar-day arithmetic shown in analysis.json. The attorneys general letter could not be archived to the Wayback Machine (downloads.regulations.gov rejects the crawler); it is retrievable from the public docket.
Sources(14) ▾
- Executive Office of the President / Office of the Federal Register, Executive Order 14270 — Zero-Based Regulatory Budgeting To Unleash American Energy (2025-04-15) — the sunset mandate itself: which agencies and statutes are covered, the September 30, 2025 deadline, the 1-year conditional sunset date for existing regulations, the 5-year cap on extensions, and the comment-before-expiration mechanism govinfo.gov · original document
- U.S. Department of Energy / Office of the Federal Register, Zero-Based Regulating (direct final rule; request for comments) (2026-05-29) — the withdrawn rule: the 28 parts amended plus new part 1061, the July 13, 2027 and July 13, 2031 expiration dates, the 'non-controversial' certification, the OIRA significance determination, the UMRA statement, and the section-level extension machinery govinfo.gov · original document
- U.S. Department of Energy / Office of the Federal Register, Zero-Based Regulating (notice of proposed rulemaking; request for comments) (2026-05-29) — the companion proposed rule — same sunset provisions, same 28 parts plus part 1061, published the same day as the direct final rule; it survives the withdrawal and is the vehicle for any final action govinfo.gov · original document
- U.S. Department of Energy / Office of the Federal Register, Zero-Based Regulating (withdrawal of direct final rule) (2026-07-09) — the withdrawal: adverse comments as the stated cause, the July 9, 2026 effective date, 's commitment to respond via the parallel proposed rule — and a parts list (including 451, 452, 455) that does not match the rule being withdrawn govinfo.gov · original document
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission / Office of the Federal Register, Implementation of the Executive Order Entitled 'Zero-Based Regulatory Budgeting To Unleash American Energy' (Order No. 914, direct final rule) (2025-10-21) — FERC's implementation: sunsetting provisions inserted into regulations across 12 parts of 18 CFR, effective December 5, 2025, with conditional sunset dates of December 5, 2026 — and the same 'non-controversial' certification later used govinfo.gov · original document
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission / Office of the Federal Register, Implementation of the Executive Order Entitled 'Zero-Based Regulatory Budgeting To Unleash American Energy'; Partial Recission (2025-12-18) — the first casualty of the comment process: FERC rescinding the sunset provision it had inserted into 18 CFR 2.27 (NAESB Smart Grid Standards guidance) after one significant adverse comment, effective January 20, 2026 govinfo.gov · original document
- U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission / Office of the Federal Register, The Sunset Rule (direct final rule) (2025-12-03) — 's implementation: sunsetting provisions limited to regulations the itself describes as outdated, seldom used, or duplicative — with safety-mandate, permitting-regime, and non-covered-statute regulations excluded — effective January 8, 2026, sunset January 8, 2027 govinfo.gov · original document
- U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission / Office of the Federal Register, The Sunset Rule (confirmation of effective date; partial withdrawal) (2026-01-08) — confirming its sunset rule effective January 8, 2026 except one amendment: the sunset for 10 CFR 50.150 (aircraft impact assessment), withdrawn after significant adverse comments; eleven comments docketed on the companion proposed rule govinfo.gov · original document
- U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission / Office of the Federal Register, The Sunset Rule — Aircraft Impact Assessment (final rule) (2026-04-08) — the re-imposition, this time through ordinary final-rule procedure after responding to six comments: 10 CFR 50.150 — the post-9/11 aircraft-impact design requirement for new reactors — 'shall cease to have effect on April 8, 2027' unless extended govinfo.gov · original document
- U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission / Office of the Federal Register, Sunset Provisions (request for information) (2026-06-26) — the re-justification machinery running: asking the public for cost-and-benefit data on the 48 regulatory units in Table 1 that sunset January 8, 2027, with comments due July 27, 2026 govinfo.gov · original document
- Attorneys General of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawai'i, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington, Comments of the Attorneys General of 14 States on the Direct Final Rule 'Zero-Based Regulating' (2026-06-29) — the significant adverse comment: the count of over 500 regulations across 28 parts, the good-cause and notice arguments, and the observation that never reconciled 'non-controversial' with OIRA's significance determination downloads.regulations.gov
- Regulations.gov (eRulemaking Program), Docket DOE-HQ-2025-0603 (Zero-Based Regulating) — public submissions (2026-07-13) — the docket arithmetic: 22 comments posted on the direct final rule and 32 on the companion proposed rule as of July 13, 2026 regulations.gov
- Office of the Federal Register (federalregister.gov API), Federal Register API — Energy Department documents of type 'Rule' published in 2025 (2026-07-13) — 's rulemaking throughput for scale: 89 Energy Department final-rule documents published in calendar 2025, of which 14 were FERC's (FERC is listed under the Energy Department in the Federal Register's agency taxonomy) federalregister.gov
- U.S. Department of Energy / Office of the Federal Register, Energy Conservation Program: Procedures, Interpretations, and Policies… (Process Rule NOPR) (2026-07-07) — the parallel rewrite of how makes appliance-standards rules — the Process Rule proposal, with comments due August 6, 2026 and a public webinar July 15, 2026; appliance-standards regulations sit under one of the five statutes E.O. 14270 covers at govinfo.gov · original document
Comments
Always open. Logged-in readers can annotate paragraphs in place.
On May 29, 2026, the Department of Energy published a rule titled Zero-Based Regulating⧉ that wrote automatic expiration dates into 28 parts of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations — over 500 regulations, by the count of 14 state attorneys general, spanning Office of Science grant rules, contractor whistleblower protection, Yucca Mountain siting guidelines, and nuclear-site security. It issued the rule as a direct final rule — a procedure reserved for actions so routine that notice and comment would be pointless — stating it did "not anticipate significant public comments." The same document reports that 's regulatory review office had classified the action as significant. On July 9, 2026, DOE withdrew the rule in full⧉, "due to receipt of adverse comments" — 41 days after publication, four days before it would have taken effect. The sibling sunset rules at FERC⧉ and NRC⧉ survived the same gauntlet by carrying less: each lost exactly one provision to adverse comment and kept the rest. Their countdowns are running — FERC's regulations begin expiring December 5, 2026; 's on January 8, 2027.